INGSOC aka Google fascism …
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (8)
sorted by:
kinda seems like common sense though. its like complaining about being filmed in a public place. when you put something out there, it is out there from that point forward.
But what differentiates a "public vs private" website?
In the real world, you are protected from people "filming" you, from being in your own house.
Are you going to say that there is no website that can be considered "private property" or a "home"?
Plus, if Google is going to argue that every website is open to being scraped by them, then there is no way any website can claim to be "private" and do whatever they want (like the case of twitter banning anywords or anyone they didnt like, under guise of "a private company can do whatever it wants")
the headline itelf says "the entire public internet". of course there are private sections of the internet as well, but that's not what this is about. the difference is whether you need login credentials to view the material, which is why twitter has just changed its policy to needing login credentials to see any of it.
Idk. But it seems like google wants war with hackers. Let them
Yeah it is common sense