Not only that, not there are many waves of migration and settlement, just since the last ice age, if which quite a few give us big question marks, and little else. For all the hundreds of thousands of mounds destroyed, most predated the Indians we know, and were simply taken over by the settling tribes. There was a lot of migration, especially out west, that occurred not too long before the colonists arrived, after what seems like a civilization collapse of some kind. On top of that, the tribes that were culturally migratory didn't even recognize land rights as we normally think of them, at the time, and couldn't really have land stolen, anyway.
So, B&J's will virtue signal like this, to no end. But, would they support a tribe that is still trying to get correct treatment by the US or state governments, as defined by treaties previously agreed to? Yeah, how do you like them crickets and tumbleweeds?
Put the capslock down, son!
Not only that, not there are many waves of migration and settlement, just since the last ice age, if which quite a few give us big question marks, and little else. For all the hundreds of thousands of mounds destroyed, most predated the Indians we know, and were simply taken over by the settling tribes. There was a lot of migration, especially out west, that occurred not too long before the colonists arrived, after what seems like a civilization collapse of some kind. On top of that, the tribes that were culturally migratory didn't even recognize land rights as we normally think of them, at the time, and couldn't really have land stolen, anyway.
So, B&J's will virtue signal like this, to no end. But, would they support a tribe that is still trying to get correct treatment by the US or state governments, as defined by treaties previously agreed to? Yeah, how do you like them crickets and tumbleweeds?