sometime on July 7, someone edited the page and inserted the photo, which was quickly reverted. So, it's hard to say "Wikipedia chose...". Actually, Wikipedia chose to NOT use this photo.
Here's the actual edit inserting the Levine photo:
The exchanges on the editing are ..... well, we know how lunatic the LGBTQI brainwashed are...
The user (mistyjee) who edited in the Levine photo was registered on July 6. Obviously, with the express person of posting the levine image on the WOMAN page.
Here's the action history of the page.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Woman&action=history
sometime on July 7, someone edited the page and inserted the photo, which was quickly reverted. So, it's hard to say "Wikipedia chose...". Actually, Wikipedia chose to NOT use this photo.
Here's the actual edit inserting the Levine photo:
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Woman&diff=prev&oldid=1163890667
Here is the edit back.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Woman&diff=1163987938&oldid=1163890667
The exchanges on the editing are ..... well, we know how lunatic the LGBTQI brainwashed are...
The user (mistyjee) who edited in the Levine photo was registered on July 6. Obviously, with the express person of posting the levine image on the WOMAN page.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Mistyjee&action=history
One long time editing account at the wiki (Mr Pyles) recorded "reversed photo vandalism" talking about what the Mistyjee account did.