I found your “1” post by The American Thinker very comforting. I recently had a not so comfortable conversation with my older (Boomer) gay brother about having contributed to “Gays Against Groomers”.
Knowing he couldn’t afford to contribute, I offered to contribute in his name, which he adamantly denied me to do, because he thinks they are a right leaning entity and he can’t support anything conservative. Even though he, as a gay man, dresses conservatively and isn’t a flamer.
I thought that their cause against exposing children to transgender Ian was something we could agree on.
I was wrong apparently. So this article gives me hope that maybe, the tide to push this agenda will back off.
I found your “1” post by The American Thinker very comforting. I recently had a not so comfortable conversation with my older (Boomer) gay brother about having contributed to “Gays Against Groomers”.
Knowing he couldn’t afford to contribute, I offered to contribute in his name, which he adamantly denied me to do, because he thinks they are a right leaning entity and he can’t support anything conservative. Even though he, as a gay man, dresses conservatively and isn’t a flamer.
I thought that their cause against exposing children to transgender Ian was something we could agree on.
I was wrong apparently. So this article gives me hope that maybe, the tide to push this agenda will back off.
I pray it will 🙏
...we share the same prayers...