The one in the photo of hunter is too blurry/pixilated to make out. Structure/appearance look to be similar, but one can't really tell.
The item in Q3456 and the item on the IWC shopping page are not the same watches. Watch face, wristband, color & style of hands are different, which means they are different models.
Not sure if these details call OP's post into question, as the Q posts are notable, but the attempt at connection based on the watch itself fails the eye test. Q said there are no coincidences, which also means that there are no "close- but-not-exactly's". We were told that everything is planned and has a purpose, including such details as the face of a watch.
These are not the same watches.
The one in the photo of hunter is too blurry/pixilated to make out. Structure/appearance look to be similar, but one can't really tell.
The item in Q3456 and the item on the IWC shopping page are not the same watches. Watch face, wristband, color & style of hands are different, which means they are different models.
Not sure if these details call OP's post into question, as the Q posts are notable, but the attempt at connection based on the watch itself fails the eye test. Q said there are no coincidences, which also means that there are no "close- but-not-exactly's". We were told that everything is planned and has a purpose, including such details as the face of a watch.