This feels more like trying to muddy the waters, though.
This guy has had to settle with multiple states for misleading donors to his charitable organizations. Those organizations also have a history of abuse allegations.
What better way to through constitutional carry under the bus than paint the scam artist religious figure as being pro-gun rights?
This feels more like trying to muddy the waters, though.
This guy has had to settle with multiple states for misleading donors to his charitable organizations. Those organizations also have a history of abuse allegations.
What better way to through constitutional carry under the bus than paint the scam artist religious figure as being pro-gun rights?