Sure he's an expert. His whole family knows all about it. Didn't they hunt kids for sport in Belgium and in the Black Forest of Germany?
ANNNNNDBOOMgoes the DYNAMITE! Perfectly stated, fren.
I believe another poster added that he betrayed his own logic and motives when he said the movie was selling the idea that pedophile and human trafficking rings are run by shadowy international elites.
No Michael, although YOU may want to casually dismiss that notion as a ridiculous crock you have actually displayed your own ignorance and lack of integrity. The film is far, far more interested in discussing the evils that live in the heart of every adult (God's children are NOT for sale) and particularly the insidious creep of apathy onto citizens of the United States, the largest destination for trafficked women and children and the #1 source of demand unfortunately.
MUCH MORE TIME was devoted to discussing the aforementioned crisis of faith, lack of media coverage, inferior governmental resources, inadequate legal remedies and the pernicious exploitation of all of the above by the Cartels as the primary causes of the crisis than any sort of shadowy cabal of boogeymen are pointed out as being to blame.
Of course, if you didn't see the movie or even so much as watch a preview of it, you might PREEMPTIVELY just ASSUME it shared the reasoning of the group you call 'Q-Anon' that the prime mover ACTUALLY IS a GROUP OF INTERNATIONAL ELITES WHO MAKE UP A LION'S SHARE OF THE DEMAND CURVE, AND CAN INFLUENCE EVENTS SO AS TO EMPOWER ALL THOSE SUBHEADINGS WE MENTIONED TO EXACERBATE THE PROBLEM AND MAKE IT MUCH HARDER TO SOLVE.
BUT THE MOVIE DIDN'T SAY THAT.
YOU DID, MICHAEL.
He's at CNN for a reason
Do you ever wonder how they are still in business? After ALL the losses in revenue, viewership... hell, nearly EVERY COMPONENT of profitability for a media company?? A company that, in the middle of significant losses and financial turmoil, not to mention scandals of a salacious nature (Toobin, Lemon, Cuomo, shall we go on?) somehow decides that spending a huge budget on a streaming service with a subscription based model and hiring on a universally reviled turncoat like Chris Wallace to helm the flagship program is going to turn things around for them?
How is a company with such awful business sense and a reputation for failure still alive? When Trump recently mentions that they are in such a deep hole that they are having trouble selling the company and you consider that they are an internationally recognized brand name, that SHOULD AND WOULD OUTWEIGH ANY PRIOR SELF DESTRUCTIVE MISTAKES (see: Twitter)
But in the case of CNN its SO BAD they can't even sell the company based on its near universal brand recognition...
That's how you know they NEED a Rothschild on their staff. They would cease to exist without their inroads there, and with 3 Letter Agencies like the 🤡 in America.
ANNNNND BOOM goes the DYNAMITE! Perfectly stated, fren. I believe another poster added that he betrayed his own logic and motives when he said the movie was selling the idea that pedophile and human trafficking rings are run by shadowy international elites.
No Michael, although YOU may want to casually dismiss that notion as a ridiculous crock you have actually displayed your own ignorance and lack of integrity. The film is far, far more interested in discussing the evils that live in the heart of every adult (God's children are NOT for sale) and particularly the insidious creep of apathy onto citizens of the United States, the largest destination for trafficked women and children and the #1 source of demand unfortunately.
MUCH MORE TIME was devoted to discussing the aforementioned crisis of faith, lack of media coverage, inferior governmental resources, inadequate legal remedies and the pernicious exploitation of all of the above by the Cartels as the primary causes of the crisis than any sort of shadowy cabal of boogeymen are pointed out as being to blame.
Of course, if you didn't see the movie or even so much as watch a preview of it, you might PREEMPTIVELY just ASSUME it shared the reasoning of the group you call 'Q-Anon' that the prime mover ACTUALLY IS a GROUP OF INTERNATIONAL ELITES WHO MAKE UP A LION'S SHARE OF THE DEMAND CURVE, AND CAN INFLUENCE EVENTS SO AS TO EMPOWER ALL THOSE SUBHEADINGS WE MENTIONED TO EXACERBATE THE PROBLEM AND MAKE IT MUCH HARDER TO SOLVE.
BUT THE MOVIE DIDN'T SAY THAT.
YOU DID, MICHAEL.
Do you ever wonder how they are still in business? After ALL the losses in revenue, viewership... hell, nearly EVERY COMPONENT of profitability for a media company?? A company that, in the middle of significant losses and financial turmoil, not to mention scandals of a salacious nature (Toobin, Lemon, Cuomo, shall we go on?) somehow decides that spending a huge budget on a streaming service with a subscription based model and hiring on a universally reviled turncoat like Chris Wallace to helm the flagship program is going to turn things around for them?
How is a company with such awful business sense and a reputation for failure still alive? When Trump recently mentions that they are in such a deep hole that they are having trouble selling the company and you consider that they are an internationally recognized brand name, that SHOULD AND WOULD OUTWEIGH ANY PRIOR SELF DESTRUCTIVE MISTAKES (see: Twitter)
But in the case of CNN its SO BAD they can't even sell the company based on its near universal brand recognition...
That's how you know they NEED a Rothschild on their staff. They would cease to exist without their inroads there, and with 3 Letter Agencies like the 🤡 in America.
CNN now exists ONLY to do the dirty work.