I get what the guy is saying here. Its about framing: what is the source of the information come from? Who is saying it? If you can apply the source of the information as a bunch of kooks it will further discredit the source.
The cabal runs on secrets. They love their secrets. They love their sources. They want to stay in the shadows. And they know the information is out there already to a degree.
They want folks to be copacetic with the state of things... not noticing the slow creep towards total depravity. As somebody said it already: its not beneficial to release anything to the public, because movements are born on information. Don't shine a light on the dark spots, because it will make the cockroaches scatter.
I get what the guy is saying here. Its about framing: what is the source of the information come from? Who is saying it? If you can apply the source of the information as a bunch of kooks it will further discredit the source.
The cabal runs on secrets. They love their secrets. They love their sources. They want to stay in the shadows. And they know the information is out there already to a degree.
They want folks to be copacetic with the state of things... not noticing the slow creep towards total depravity. As somebody said it already: its not beneficial to release anything to the public, because movements are born on information. Don't shine a light on the dark spots, because it will make the cockroaches scatter.
That theory falls flat for that reason.