98% of which group of scientists? The ones already on a globalist board of some sort? I bet the agreeing scientists on that globalist board only represent 15% of existing scientists in this area of study.
Does anyone know where they get their propaganized "98%" narrative?
What can we take away from all this? First, lots of people get called “climate experts” and contribute to the appearance of consensus, without necessarily being knowledgeable about core issues. A consensus among the misinformed is not worth much.
98% of which group of scientists? The ones already on a globalist board of some sort? I bet the agreeing scientists on that globalist board only represent 15% of existing scientists in this area of study.
Does anyone know where they get their propaganized "98%" narrative?
They're using the IPCC narrative from the good ole Al Gore days. Just the same bullshit over and over again.
https://www.fraserinstitute.org/article/putting-the-con-in-consensus-not-only-is-there-no-97-per-cent-consensus-among-climate-scientists-many-misunderstand-core-issues
Great article. I will use this one!
What can we take away from all this? First, lots of people get called “climate experts” and contribute to the appearance of consensus, without necessarily being knowledgeable about core issues. A consensus among the misinformed is not worth much.