Possibly, it is the 'oldest profession' so has been viewed as legitimate business by many. However, one has to find out whether the woman, or child, was coerced into being with Hunter first. Recording the session without their consent is more serious, however. Once there is a recording, the material can be distributed online etc. etc.
Hilarious, them getting knickers in a twist over MTG showing the proofs, though. "Should we be showing that in a public hearing?"
Too late.
As Kennedy said: It is like when you flush the toilet, and it backs up.
Paying a prostitute is human trafficking.
Possibly, it is the 'oldest profession' so has been viewed as legitimate business by many. However, one has to find out whether the woman, or child, was coerced into being with Hunter first. Recording the session without their consent is more serious, however. Once there is a recording, the material can be distributed online etc. etc.
Hilarious, them getting knickers in a twist over MTG showing the proofs, though. "Should we be showing that in a public hearing?"
Too late.
As Kennedy said: It is like when you flush the toilet, and it backs up.
Legally it trafficking to pay a prostitute.
State laws may very of course......
In the state of Ukraine perhaps it is perfectly fine...
Sex tourism breaks us law......
Not if you are an 'elite' - then you are above the law!
As soon as something of this nature crosses a State line, it violates all kinds of Interstate Commerce Laws.
But someone had to show it, if only to illustrate that it has happened.