Be wary of gnostic thinking.
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (37)
sorted by:
I prefer Source. Imo it is as unambiguous, descriptive, and succinct as it is possible to be in this scope. No one mistakes the word Source, no matter what your dogma. Even if you believe Source is as dumb as a box of rocks, you intuitively understand what It Is. "God" on the other hand carries different connotations for just about everyone.
Showing links to the Codex Theodosianus helps in exposing this. Most people have no idea how the "Christian Church" started (as we understand the term today). Even those (especially those) that recite the Nicene Creed have no clue where it comes from, or what debates were shut down by those Empire wide laws.
good post, fren.
My best friend and I have an in joke where we refer to it as the grand and holy neegus. We used to crack up at this video, the irony and humour about it sort of stuck https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=of6a394_Owg
Star Trek fan, or is there another (or multiple) intention(s)?
The video was interesting. I felt sorry for the kid, but he pulled it through like a champ (and not just because he spelled it correctly).
Actually the fact the Ferengi have 'The Grand Nagus' was a coincidence that came later, it's pretty funny. We just used to laugh at the video because of the implied racism and expected answer the kid was going to give, but then somehow nails it right before you think he's about to drop the N bomb. Somehow the absurdity related to the abstract nature of the Source.