- Trump University
- “He’s a Russian patsy”, or something to that effect.
- He said nazis were very fine people. (This one I already have a quality rebuttal for.)
- His Atlantic City casino and unpaid contractors.
- Sexual battery (if they’re being kind) or just rape (if the TDS is severe).
I just want to be able to say, “Well, actually…” when someone says one of these things to me. Anyone got suggestions?
All of those points are character attacks, and have absolutely nothing to do with his job qualifications for being president of the USA. He has already been president, and his job record reflects well to support his superb qualifications for being president again. The point being- "How does any of that affect his performance as a president?"
The Russian asset accusation is a non-point, because it has been thoroughly proven that the "secret Russian agent" propaganda was all fabricated lies created by the Clinton campaign, and promoted by political enemies.
There is no "sexual battery, or rape" as that would be a criminal offense, which he has not been criminally charged for. So, again a non-point regarding a civil lawsuit, with a Trump hater judge overseeing the case for a money grubbing, gold-digger bitch, both out to "get Trump."
Ad hominem - the most overused of the logical fallacies