I think a lot of Q-statements are taken to mean more than they were meant by Q. For instance, "symbolism will be their downfall." Everyone uses symbols, everyone, you and me. But how do their symbols lead to downfall? This whole idea that they are bragging, showing off through flaunting certain symbols, and thus will be identified,, is one interpretation, which appears to me based on a questionable theory that "the Devil always tells you what he will do." Without going into that, what other ways of using symbols could lead to downfall? One that jumps to me is that most symbols have more than one meaning, and anyone trying to communicate through symbols as a secret code could make a mistake in meaning. Or, trying to reduce ideas to symbols would lead to over simplification. Or, being intent on doing symbolic things the way the lefties love to do, like gluing themselves to streets, will lead to disaster because form is made more important than function, time is wasted making statements..
I just rewatched Snowden. It's truly amazing what my last 3 years here has taught. First time I watched it, I took it at face value. I took the explanation here at face value (i.e. snowden is a bad guy because c*a wanted to destroy NSA control). Now I am thinking Snowdon was a white hat even if he didn't know.
I also think the girl was his handler. I think his cia contact was white hat. I think he was sincere, as was at least greenburg. Why? The mainstream reported it. Obama approved that or it wouldn't have seen the light of day.
The cia went after the nsa. The msa retaliated. Without snowden, the majority in this country wouldn't understand the power of the internet and cell phones and cameras in your refrigerator. No awakening in the last ten years would have happened without this basic knowledge. Stage set for giving military veto power over Intel and the establishment of space force.
I think a lot of Q-statements are taken to mean more than they were meant by Q. For instance, "symbolism will be their downfall." Everyone uses symbols, everyone, you and me. But how do their symbols lead to downfall? This whole idea that they are bragging, showing off through flaunting certain symbols, and thus will be identified,, is one interpretation, which appears to me based on a questionable theory that "the Devil always tells you what he will do." Without going into that, what other ways of using symbols could lead to downfall? One that jumps to me is that most symbols have more than one meaning, and anyone trying to communicate through symbols as a secret code could make a mistake in meaning. Or, trying to reduce ideas to symbols would lead to over simplification. Or, being intent on doing symbolic things the way the lefties love to do, like gluing themselves to streets, will lead to disaster because form is made more important than function, time is wasted making statements..
I just rewatched Snowden. It's truly amazing what my last 3 years here has taught. First time I watched it, I took it at face value. I took the explanation here at face value (i.e. snowden is a bad guy because c*a wanted to destroy NSA control). Now I am thinking Snowdon was a white hat even if he didn't know.
I also think the girl was his handler. I think his cia contact was white hat. I think he was sincere, as was at least greenburg. Why? The mainstream reported it. Obama approved that or it wouldn't have seen the light of day.
The cia went after the nsa. The msa retaliated. Without snowden, the majority in this country wouldn't understand the power of the internet and cell phones and cameras in your refrigerator. No awakening in the last ten years would have happened without this basic knowledge. Stage set for giving military veto power over Intel and the establishment of space force.
And Putin took snowden in.