1
Notimportant81 1 point ago +1 / -0

This. Absolutely this. The literal hell we have paid for a bought and paid for "free" press is incalculable.

2
Notimportant81 2 points ago +2 / -0

This. And the stand on the 2nd Amendment is an impossible hurdle, as is their decades old stance on freedom of speech.

1
Notimportant81 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hope Trump follows through with his admonition to the government to just explain the NJ drone event. The Ukraine thing also needs explaining.

2
Notimportant81 2 points ago +2 / -0

The ERA literally says no distinction in law between men and women. That's it. I vaguely remember one of the anti arguments had to do with shared restrooms. Unthinkable at the time, so dismissed.

4
Notimportant81 4 points ago +4 / -0

Democrats: $750. We won't go into forbidding volunteers access to save people; refusing cadaver sniffing dogs; rejecting Amish built houses because building codes...and then there's Palestine Ohio where fema opened poisoned land and resources to residents and Lahina where the police wouldn't allow people to flee the fire. And las vegas. We know who these monsters are. Pray they are prosecuted.

5
Notimportant81 5 points ago +5 / -0

Excellent interview. I am liking Hegseth more and more. Mike Rowe is a given.

3
Notimportant81 3 points ago +3 / -0

We didn't and the one they tried to pass 50 years (give or take) didn't include any of the alphabet genders. Just women. And the arguments against it centered around laws that protected women, like job protection during child birth, which would be unconstitutional if passed. It got through the house and senate but was never ratified by the states.

1
Notimportant81 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, I don't remember anything except festivities being altered because of cold weather. I don't remember whether it was his first or second innaugeration.

5
Notimportant81 5 points ago +5 / -0

Nope. Just noting what I have watched and as the guy advocates, all info should be taken into account. Absolutism is a red flag for me.

For example he mentions be wary of anything that automatically outrages, like "we are doing this in defense of children." Like we shouldn't be outraged in the extreme about sexual predators and satanic sacrifices? Epstein, Diddy, Hollywood, washington. As if chemically castrating children has a pure upside.

2
Notimportant81 2 points ago +2 / -0

I have watched this guy as one of a group of four which analyzes body language. This group is not pro Trump. I think what he's saying is accurate, but the reactions he's talking about can also be genuine to truth revealed or truth discovered.

16
Notimportant81 16 points ago +16 / -0

Food testers on duty? Wasn't poison one of the deep state's assassination attempts?

1
Notimportant81 1 point ago +1 / -0

I have a telephone and one finger and no printer. I recalled his appearances on Fox when he was pushing his wonder solution to energy independence.

I have no idea if he was foolishly sincere or deep state. I do sincerely question the engineering in producing these monstrosities. Seems basic engineering would have revealed design flaws and maintenance problems. And where were our vocal and active environmentalists? These things kill protected wild life and sea creatures.

view more: Next ›