Sorry, but I got to the 50-minute mark and started watching. Nothing but mumbo-jumbo and self-righteous pontificating. The technology he was brandishing (but not explaining) was so obscure, it could mean everything or nothing. I've been granted more than a few patents in technology and there is a big difference between a patent on paper and proven technology in the laboratory. If he wants to warn "beware of fakes!", I will be glad to include him in the warning.
Don't be sly. I'm familiar with a lot of technical literature and the introduction of entirely new nomenclature is not just "research," it is a kind of wall against understanding. Photons are bosons, and coherent photons describe lasers, which absolutely cannot propagate beams through solid matter as though the matter were invisible. One would have to read the entire patent in order to understand what the inventors were talking about---including the "thermal bath" that he took to be so tremendous. A little explanation would have clarified the subject and added to his credibility. Absence of which does the opposite.
Watch the whole video. There is a new type of physics being researched so new names for it are mandatory. Its not my fault you couldn't understand it.
If you would like to talk to Mr Greenyer in order to know what he is saying you can email him on http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/en/
No. I place value on literacy and being able to write things down so they can be read (and cross-checked). I've seen too much fake science under the guise of videos, and I don't have time to waste waiting for the punch line. Especially when the narrator spends 5 minutes in melodramatic posing.
You want interesting physics and nomenclature, tuck into "Information Mechanics" by Frederick Kantor. But the odd nomenclature is not helpful.
"Coherent-matter waves" fancy name for FAKE FAKE FAKE but dramatic scary "ET fake attack phenomenon" Don't let yourself or other people decide an invasion is real just because the deep dark state can show off a little. Fear is their greatest weapon against you. Don't cooperate.
This is highly technical stuff, way over my pointy little head but anything you can learn in a week or so isn't worth very much.
Sorry, but I got to the 50-minute mark and started watching. Nothing but mumbo-jumbo and self-righteous pontificating. The technology he was brandishing (but not explaining) was so obscure, it could mean everything or nothing. I've been granted more than a few patents in technology and there is a big difference between a patent on paper and proven technology in the laboratory. If he wants to warn "beware of fakes!", I will be glad to include him in the warning.
Of course its obscure, its research.
Don't be sly. I'm familiar with a lot of technical literature and the introduction of entirely new nomenclature is not just "research," it is a kind of wall against understanding. Photons are bosons, and coherent photons describe lasers, which absolutely cannot propagate beams through solid matter as though the matter were invisible. One would have to read the entire patent in order to understand what the inventors were talking about---including the "thermal bath" that he took to be so tremendous. A little explanation would have clarified the subject and added to his credibility. Absence of which does the opposite.
Watch the whole video. There is a new type of physics being researched so new names for it are mandatory. Its not my fault you couldn't understand it. If you would like to talk to Mr Greenyer in order to know what he is saying you can email him on http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/en/
No. I place value on literacy and being able to write things down so they can be read (and cross-checked). I've seen too much fake science under the guise of videos, and I don't have time to waste waiting for the punch line. Especially when the narrator spends 5 minutes in melodramatic posing.
You want interesting physics and nomenclature, tuck into "Information Mechanics" by Frederick Kantor. But the odd nomenclature is not helpful.
You won't know its fake if you reject it out of hand. Tom Bearden?
What about Tom Bearden? He has his theory to promote. "Scalar waves" are simple mumbo-jumbo.
Well... brainiacs can be annoying....
This video has some hidden gems in it about a lot of other things. It's a keeper.
It does doesn't it?
Bob Greenyer has a LOT of videos that have the same effect, try "How was Nan Madol built?"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cUdzYvaX3pI&t=2923s
"Coherent-matter waves" fancy name for FAKE FAKE FAKE but dramatic scary "ET fake attack phenomenon" Don't let yourself or other people decide an invasion is real just because the deep dark state can show off a little. Fear is their greatest weapon against you. Don't cooperate.
You will be shocked by the gems of info in this video. It is an info-junkie's delight.