If you don't understand the question or direction of the discussion, no big deal. However, characterizing this as 'arguing about' such a trivial point misses the real point, imo.
I hesitate to elaborate, as I've already done so and you seem to dodge all the references to your own arguments and queries related thereto. Inability to think critically about one's own hypothesis from any angle other than one's own is a common characteristic of highly intellectualized theorizing.
No matter. If you didn't get it, you didn't get it.
If you don't understand the question or direction of the discussion, no big deal. However, characterizing this as 'arguing about' such a trivial point misses the real point, imo.
I hesitate to elaborate, as I've already done so and you seem to dodge all the references to your own arguments and queries related thereto. Inability to think critically about one's own hypothesis from any angle other than one's own is a common characteristic of highly intellectualized theorizing.
No matter. If you didn't get it, you didn't get it.
I answered your question so I don't know what you think I'm dodging or not thinking critically about.