"An honest man falls in love with an honest woman; he wishes, therefore to marry her, to be the father of her children, to secure her and himself. All systems of government should be tested by whether he can do this. If any system - feudal, servile, or barbaric - does, in fact, give him so large a cabbagefield that he can do that, there is the essence of liberty and justice. If any system - Republican, mercantile, or Eugenist - does, in fact, give him so small a salary that he can't do it, there is the essence of eternal tyranny and shame.
The family is the test of freedom; because the family is the only thing that the free man does for himself and by himself"
Sticky reason (and for my personal save):
MVP... GK Chesterton was the OG
Yeah, see, I can comprehend that....
It is the very first time in my life that I have heard the ""Social Contract"", explained in such a manner as to make any sense at all....
Absolutely ALL other ways have failure points that can easily be pointed out, and shown to be fraudulent....
And I still don't agree with this silly notion of a ""Social Construct"", as it rarely takes into account Human Nature....