This is a valid criticism, I still don’t know how he’ll get around all this with the evidence

Trumps lawyers first move should be a motion for change of venue. Forcing this Judge to rule against them will frame the entire proceeding as political and without merit based on the evidence. It will awaken many more normies. We are in the disclosure phase. Waking up as many normies as possible is the goal here.

This case will end up at SCOTUS. There is no way it is done before Nov. 2024 and a conviction under appeal doesnt preclude Trump from running.

Im far more worried about the RNC dirty tricks. Tricks that lead to Trump being left off Primary ballots entirely and/ or a brokered convention where the rules are such that they can steal a legitimate nomination from Trump.

evidence can be, and should be, presented at lower level court even if the lower court doesn't "allow" it. as long as the evidence is part of "the court record" the evidence can be raised upon appeals, including specific appeals as to the lower court's ruling that said evidence was deemed inadmissible.

for example if a defendant accused of murder had a video tape of another person killing the victim and that lower court ruled the tape was inadmissible for whatever reason, a higher court could exonerate the defendant by finding the lower court erred in their ruling on the inadmissibility of the tape

You can keep appealing your case all the way up to the supreme court. This judge will railroad him so democrats can say "convicted felon donald trump" but he will be vindicated by an appeals court or the supreme court, ultimately

I was saying the same thing the other day. The corrupt judge has a say on what evidence and witnesses can be called. Hell they can seal evidence. They can boot the cameras out.