In other words, the Q movement came into existence because of the original Q (just some random anon)?
That would be pretty inspiring to me.
In other words, the Q movement came into existence because of the original Q (just some random anon)?
That would be pretty inspiring to me.
No need for hostility, fren. I'm just trying to have an open discussion.
Preach it tendy!
First, thanks for the history on that. I hear your frustration about wanting to have a space to discuss/analyze Q in your own way, and that it was constantly getting infiltrated.
For what it's worth, and you can believe me or not, I'm not a bot, or an 'infiltrator' or whatever. I'm just a guy who decided, for the first time in mid 2021, to look at Q with an open mind, and when I did I found some interesting info.
My intent with posting this was not to 'stir up discord' or whatever, I just wanted to share an idea that was rolling around in my brain. My thought was that if people didn't like it, they could just ignore it and move on, or the mods could delete it if they felt it was that important for this kind of question not to be asked here.
As for the last part, I'd much rather be on here than p.win, because you guys are awesome and have given me so much since I first joined a couple years ago.
Thanks again for the discussion & God bless.
I just want to point out that nowhere, including in this post, did I ever say or suggest 'Q is a LARP', which is the issue you seem to be focused on.
There's a difference between saying 'Q is just one giant trolljob' vs asking/suggesting if Q could have been started by a perhaps unlikely source.
I sometimes explain it thus. Pick a decade you would have liked to have been around in, say the 1960's, for its music, cultural events, historic events etc. You weren't there but have a real passion for it.
You can't really fully understand it because you didn't experience it, but you've read all about it, seen all the films, pictures, and you think you know all the details.
Now try telling someone who was there that your understanding about the decade is correct to someone who was there for real, and that they have got things wrong.
You get the idea, right?