Great to know you rely on the fact check---which dismisses any silly notion that the U.S. was other than what it is, a republic. (Think of a Venn diagram with a balloon labeled "corporation". Think of other balloons within that balloon, labeled "republic", "city", "business enterprise." A republic is not a business enterprise, just like an elephant is not an alligator.)
Actually you were wrong on the 49th parallel. The Convention of 1818 provided for the 49th parallel as a boundary, yes, but also for joint administration of the area called Oregon territory by the U.S. and the Columbia Department of Canada by the British, for a period of 10 years. There was a falling out between the U.S. and Great Britain which made joint administration untenable. This was resolved by the treaty of Oregon in 1846, which separated the claims consistent with the 49th parallel boundary. But the question of who had the San Juan islands was still open, to be resolved the the process of the 1871 treaty (not by the treaty itself). The existence of Point Roberts is a testament to the scrupulous adherence to the final terms of the border resolution. The world of international politics is seldom tidy, especially when it comes to borders.
If you would actually do some research instead of confirmation bias, you might have more understanding. Your uninformed and knee-jerk reaction discredits your argument.
What fake? You keep on making claims and accusations and you provide nothing. One reads the primary documents (Organic act of 1871, Treaty of 1871) and they have nothing to do with the fantasy you are touting. Original sources trump "fact check" in my book.
Not wrong about the 49th parallel; nothing wrong about reaffirmation from earlier times, in order to settle the agreement. The process followed after the treaty of 1871 led to the resolution of the ownership of the San Juan islands and the creation of Point Roberts. You missed the Oregon Treaty of 1846, didn't you? You must live in a research-free zone.
This happens all the time in the self-gaslighting conspiracy environment. A claim is made and fingers are pointed...but there is no key fact that can be stated in a sentence. And the damning claim is always by a process of convoluted inference. The proponents are usually inarticulate and can only refer you to lengthy documents. This is tiresome and indicative of there being no substance to the claims.
This whole idea that the United States is a "corporation" like IBM is as nutty as a walnut tree. I think you can't handle the emotional letdown of realizing that this has all happened with the stupidity, callousness, and perversity of your neighbors far and wide. Yeah, a massive legal maneuver can "free" us from covert tyranny---but what are we to do when our fellow citizens can't think worth shit? Sniff hard. There's no magic in the air.
I don't recall Q ever making any claims about "corporate United States," but I do think you are lacking in understanding or sauce. It always ends up that guys like you have only assertions to make---but no substantiation. And when you are out-maneuvered (e.g., treaty of 1846) you are exasperated and all you have left are insults, name-calling, and hostility.
And I don't much respect the attempt to put nonsensical conspiratorial theories on Q's back.
Great to know you rely on the fact check---which dismisses any silly notion that the U.S. was other than what it is, a republic. (Think of a Venn diagram with a balloon labeled "corporation". Think of other balloons within that balloon, labeled "republic", "city", "business enterprise." A republic is not a business enterprise, just like an elephant is not an alligator.)
Actually you were wrong on the 49th parallel. The Convention of 1818 provided for the 49th parallel as a boundary, yes, but also for joint administration of the area called Oregon territory by the U.S. and the Columbia Department of Canada by the British, for a period of 10 years. There was a falling out between the U.S. and Great Britain which made joint administration untenable. This was resolved by the treaty of Oregon in 1846, which separated the claims consistent with the 49th parallel boundary. But the question of who had the San Juan islands was still open, to be resolved the the process of the 1871 treaty (not by the treaty itself). The existence of Point Roberts is a testament to the scrupulous adherence to the final terms of the border resolution. The world of international politics is seldom tidy, especially when it comes to borders.
If you would actually do some research instead of confirmation bias, you might have more understanding. Your uninformed and knee-jerk reaction discredits your argument.
I'm not relying on the fact check.
I'm saying I'm not interested on hearing you repeat the fake news narrative I'm already aware of.
And, yes, quit trying to rewrite history. You were wrong about the 49th parallel and now you're regurgitating the article I already posted.
Sorry, the original author was much better, that I can tell you.
What fake? You keep on making claims and accusations and you provide nothing. One reads the primary documents (Organic act of 1871, Treaty of 1871) and they have nothing to do with the fantasy you are touting. Original sources trump "fact check" in my book.
Not wrong about the 49th parallel; nothing wrong about reaffirmation from earlier times, in order to settle the agreement. The process followed after the treaty of 1871 led to the resolution of the ownership of the San Juan islands and the creation of Point Roberts. You missed the Oregon Treaty of 1846, didn't you? You must live in a research-free zone.
This happens all the time in the self-gaslighting conspiracy environment. A claim is made and fingers are pointed...but there is no key fact that can be stated in a sentence. And the damning claim is always by a process of convoluted inference. The proponents are usually inarticulate and can only refer you to lengthy documents. This is tiresome and indicative of there being no substance to the claims.
This whole idea that the United States is a "corporation" like IBM is as nutty as a walnut tree. I think you can't handle the emotional letdown of realizing that this has all happened with the stupidity, callousness, and perversity of your neighbors far and wide. Yeah, a massive legal maneuver can "free" us from covert tyranny---but what are we to do when our fellow citizens can't think worth shit? Sniff hard. There's no magic in the air.
You think Q is full of shit and you're a disinfo shill.
GTFOH
I don't recall Q ever making any claims about "corporate United States," but I do think you are lacking in understanding or sauce. It always ends up that guys like you have only assertions to make---but no substantiation. And when you are out-maneuvered (e.g., treaty of 1846) you are exasperated and all you have left are insults, name-calling, and hostility.
And I don't much respect the attempt to put nonsensical conspiratorial theories on Q's back.