I've seen Trump call for the Fed to take over D.C. several times this year(as recent as this week according to Posobiec). I have been wondering if this would satisfy the condition listed in 11.3 End of Occupation.
Belligerent occupation ends when the Occupying Power no longer has effectively placed the occupied territory under its control. 83 For example, an uprising by the local population may prevent the Occupying Power from actually enforcing its authority over occupied territory. Similarly, the Occupying Power’s expulsion or complete withdrawal from the territory would also suffice because the former Occupying Power generally would not be able to control sufficiently the occupied territory
Question is if the Fed taking over D.C. would count as "Occupying Power’s expulsion"
Maybe it could but the plan won't be executed that way so this might be Trump doing a little trolling?
There is an addendum that I just thought of that I really should have added.
A municipality runs on bonds. Bonds are created, people (or more likely banks) buy the bonds, and then the municipality can build things. Normally, the bond holders have no legal say in how a municipality runs its affairs. If someone holds enough bonds, they may effectively have a say, but legally, they aren't supposed to. (Think Boss Hogg from Dukes of Hazzard). If a municipality is bankrupt however, the bond holders gain managerial control of the municipality until the bankruptcy is completed.
It is entirely possible that has happened with the District of Columbia. I don't know. I have found no evidence that DC has ever declared bankruptcy, nor have I been able to pin down who owns the majority of the bonds. Nevertheless, it is an important piece of information that may be applicable here.
There may also be something similar happening regarding the Fed and the US Govt., though I never found any explicit laws that state that the bond holders of the US Govt gain legal managerial control if the US goes bankrupt, as there is for a municipality, nor have I found good evidence that the US has ever declared bankruptcy (though there is some evidence). It does stand to reason that might apply to the US Govt/Fed relationship however.
Again though, all of that is really moot. That's just the "legal" stuff. The Cabal has total control regardless of the legality of it.
Beyond that, "law" is just a fabrication of reality anyways (AKA an illusion). It doesn't actually exist. It doesn't set any actual limits on actions, rather it sets consequences to enforce illusionary limits (AKA coercion). "Law" only means something until the people decide it doesn't. All Laws, indeed, the very institution of law itself, was created by the Cabal in the first place. It is a completely unnecessary idea, designed purely for fuckery (at least as we currently understand it).