Personally, I think there is something to what Jan Halper says… I think Jordan gets a little too hung up on the particulars, but what do you think about his analysis??:
Dr. Jan Halper-Hayes also mentioned in the interview that she “sits on a Department of Defense task force”. I dug into this and could find nothing on the internet to show that she does in fact sit on a D.O.D. task force. She may, but she also may not. I want more proof than just words. I could not completely write her off though, as she did sit on Trump’s transition team in 2016, and this one is provable.
Read a lot more here: https://jordansather.substack.com/p/is-the-united-states-a-corporation
My first thought is I don’t believe our government would actually provide the source material that shows they gave up our Republic. Not saying I totally believe it, but no way they would put that in plain sight. If true, it has to be buried in multiple bills and treaties.
Second thought, I remember someone making a big deal out of statements made in the Texas Election lawsuit against the swing states that altered their election laws without going through their legislatures. The statement or statements were saying the case was correct if we are truly a Republic. Striking the case down on standing sure seems to suggest we are not.
I also have to note that it is interesting Ken Paxton had a such a thorough and well thought out challenge ready to go so quickly.
Now to the interview itself. What interested me the most in the interview was the MSM personalities didn’t challenge her on much of what she said.
My recollection is they challenged her on a comment about not knowing what was done through voting machines. And, on President Trump being a straight shooter. The female presenter also tried to get Halper-Hayes to agree President Trump should have accepted the reported election results.
They largely ignored the 1871 Treaty comment, the Vatican Gold story, Space Force has the real results, POTUS stood down to avoid civil war, and others. That was weird, but evidently not in their script?
Still, President Trump re-truthed it for a purpose. Could some of it be disinformation? Perhaps. Either way his specialty is trolling the DS into making mistakes. Panic in DC is still running!
Thanks, all good information. I think you are totally right about not leaving this info in plain site. Did you know Trump retruthed a second video of hers since this one? To me, it is logical this is the truth. Trump could retruth many other people talking about election fraud, but he retruthed her, with all the booms. If this is not true, just like Q, why would he want to make his supporters look like chumps believing this stuff?