Apparently. User just got banned for a week, because he said he doesn’t believe in devolution (an anon theory) and only follows Q drops. I don’t think that even violates any side bar rules, but yet the anon got temporarily banned.
No, my fluffy little 1266 post score... this user was vacationed and given homework. Learn how this works. This is the playing field. If you wander onto the field, fine, please do, but occasionally someone will hand you the ball and expect you to run with it. In that case, that was me. I do this extremely rarely, but I will not hesitate to move folks to the sidelines where they belong, in full view of everyone, and I'm not in the least bit concerned if it makes me unpopular with our more low-effort, low-info frogs. GAW's heavy lifters didn't bat an eye at what I did because they know it only makes more room for them to shine and do what they do best.
You temporarily banned someone for a week - not for violating side bar rules, but because they don’t believe a specific ANON theory, and explicitly said they only follow Q posts…
Let’s call it for what it is, instead of passive aggressive adhominims about my post history or dressing up a temporary ban and calling it a vacation and assigning homework. You should be concerned that you’re banning anons for other things besides the actual rules, no matter what other people think. It just seems like a power run, banning anyone (whether temporary or permanently) for not agreeing with you - not Q, not Trump, but your own theories.
No one. Emphasis on NOONE, except the Q team, knows the plan. If devolution ends up not being a part of the plan, how will you rectify falsely punishing other anons for not believing a then-disproven theory? Will you “vacation” yourself?
Apparently. User just got banned for a week, because he said he doesn’t believe in devolution (an anon theory) and only follows Q drops. I don’t think that even violates any side bar rules, but yet the anon got temporarily banned.
No, my fluffy little 1266 post score... this user was vacationed and given homework. Learn how this works. This is the playing field. If you wander onto the field, fine, please do, but occasionally someone will hand you the ball and expect you to run with it. In that case, that was me. I do this extremely rarely, but I will not hesitate to move folks to the sidelines where they belong, in full view of everyone, and I'm not in the least bit concerned if it makes me unpopular with our more low-effort, low-info frogs. GAW's heavy lifters didn't bat an eye at what I did because they know it only makes more room for them to shine and do what they do best.
You temporarily banned someone for a week - not for violating side bar rules, but because they don’t believe a specific ANON theory, and explicitly said they only follow Q posts… Let’s call it for what it is, instead of passive aggressive adhominims about my post history or dressing up a temporary ban and calling it a vacation and assigning homework. You should be concerned that you’re banning anons for other things besides the actual rules, no matter what other people think. It just seems like a power run, banning anyone (whether temporary or permanently) for not agreeing with you - not Q, not Trump, but your own theories.
No one. Emphasis on NOONE, except the Q team, knows the plan. If devolution ends up not being a part of the plan, how will you rectify falsely punishing other anons for not believing a then-disproven theory? Will you “vacation” yourself?