Right, and presenting evidence to defend himself in a criminal trial doesn't change that fact. It's not like the Courts that ignored hearing his election cases last time are suddenly going to hear them because of evidence presented in his criminal trial. And the DOJ certainly isn't going to prosecute or investigate anything based on that evidence. And do you really think if the Deep State was concerned about any evidence he had to present that they wouldn't just drop the charge he'd use the evidence to defend against?
Actually this is where i d8sagree. Because of what i
He is charged with. Part of proving his innocence is prov8ng the election was stolen. They predicate alot of his cgarges on the fact the election wasnt stolen. To think he wont have q chan e to prove it now is way wrong imo
Right, and presenting evidence to defend himself in a criminal trial doesn't change that fact. It's not like the Courts that ignored hearing his election cases last time are suddenly going to hear them because of evidence presented in his criminal trial. And the DOJ certainly isn't going to prosecute or investigate anything based on that evidence. And do you really think if the Deep State was concerned about any evidence he had to present that they wouldn't just drop the charge he'd use the evidence to defend against?
Actually this is where i d8sagree. Because of what i He is charged with. Part of proving his innocence is prov8ng the election was stolen. They predicate alot of his cgarges on the fact the election wasnt stolen. To think he wont have q chan e to prove it now is way wrong imo