Spoilers...if you can spoil a classic movie...

In the movie Miracle in 34th, Kris Kringle is sent to court, to determine if he is crazy and should be sent to the state hospital for claiming he is Santa Claus. Most lawyers would take the easy defense and say that their client is just an eccentric old man that liked to say such nonsensical things for the sake of the children. Instead, Kringle's lawyer takes the position to legally prove in court that Santa Claus is indeed real, and that Kris Kringle, his client, really was Santa Claus.

After a series of dramas, the court declares that Kris Kringle is indeed Santa Claus and it is a happy ending for all.

I believe that is the type of direction we may see in the court of Donald J Trump. Trump can take the stance that he has a first amendment and has the right to speak his opinion that he felt the election was stolen from him, whether it is right or wrong. If there was an ounce of integrity in any jury, they would agree that is his right.

I believe Trump will take the more difficult but more consequential defense. I believe DJT's entire defense will be solely focused on if the election was stolen. Once the election starts, I believe many gleeful individuals on the left will immediately want the trials to stop.

I've never seen conservatives so upset and worried before. Not me. I'm looking forward to the show.

Kek.