She's explaining the successful grooming process and why/how children can be lured in without realizing they're being groomed. Her mistake is to admit that if done "right", and "the molester is any good" the child doesn't even recognize they're being molested because "the child is part of it."
This is a surprisingly open revelation of the evil and insidious methods of successful pedophiles. They operate without exposure by manipulating childrens' perceptions of what is happening to them.
Yes. The community notes is correct on her front-facing facade about being on the side of the alleged victims.
But her phrasing is terrible and not only exposes the real opinion disguised under a plausible deniability protective shroud, but is also par for the course in that they still weirdly talk about their transgressions as if it causes an implied consent.
She's explaining the successful grooming process and why/how children can be lured in without realizing they're being groomed. Her mistake is to admit that if done "right", and "the molester is any good" the child doesn't even recognize they're being molested because "the child is part of it."
This is a surprisingly open revelation of the evil and insidious methods of successful pedophiles. They operate without exposure by manipulating childrens' perceptions of what is happening to them.
Yes. The community notes is correct on her front-facing facade about being on the side of the alleged victims.
But her phrasing is terrible and not only exposes the real opinion disguised under a plausible deniability protective shroud, but is also par for the course in that they still weirdly talk about their transgressions as if it causes an implied consent.