I worry phase 1 was to implement a kill switch via vaccines. Phase 2 is a virus that activates the kill switch. And to the average Democrat, it just looks like an invisible virus plague.
I worry phase 1 was to implement a kill switch via vaccines. Phase 2 is a virus that activates the kill switch.
I don't think it's a killswitch per say, "just" a highly increased chance of death from future SARS-CoV-2 strains.
By calling something a "killswitch" in bio/genetic weaponry it alludes to killing everyone with a specific genetic marker, i.e. everybody in a certain ethnical group since they share a specific marker. Or everybody related to person X.
What would people think if 95+% of the deaths from a new wave is vaccinated people? They'd catch on real quick. By "thinning out the herd" instead of wiping it out, they can keep this pathetic propaganda dance going for the pathetic people who can't seem to get off the endless ride.
Which would do what? Kill all the vaxxies? That's what I'm arguing against. Increase mortality? That's what I'm arguing for. Perhaps something else?
Discussing the actual methods would be pure speculation at this point unless you have any reason for suggesting dormant mRNA. Please do share, lest you want me to believe it was just a guess.
I worry phase 1 was to implement a kill switch via vaccines. Phase 2 is a virus that activates the kill switch. And to the average Democrat, it just looks like an invisible virus plague.
I don't think it's a killswitch per say, "just" a highly increased chance of death from future SARS-CoV-2 strains.
By calling something a "killswitch" in bio/genetic weaponry it alludes to killing everyone with a specific genetic marker, i.e. everybody in a certain ethnical group since they share a specific marker. Or everybody related to person X.
What would people think if 95+% of the deaths from a new wave is vaccinated people? They'd catch on real quick. By "thinning out the herd" instead of wiping it out, they can keep this pathetic propaganda dance going for the pathetic people who can't seem to get off the endless ride.
Or they inserted a dormant piece of MRNA that will be “turned on” during the next one.
Which would do what? Kill all the vaxxies? That's what I'm arguing against. Increase mortality? That's what I'm arguing for. Perhaps something else?
Discussing the actual methods would be pure speculation at this point unless you have any reason for suggesting dormant mRNA. Please do share, lest you want me to believe it was just a guess.