Thank you. We are all here digging for the truth. The lack of landing gears , tires and tail section made this highly suspect from the photos we had seen. The small fin made me suspect cruise missile as the parking lot at the pentagon makes it difficult to maneuver in position even for experienced pilots. There is a possibility a cruise missile could appear to be a small plane to some witnesses. The fins would provide us the real answer. If they have it on the photo then they should have it as evidence.
sure... but I find it impossible to believe a large jetliner and a cruise missile could pass over and strike the Pentagon, simultaneously. I do reserve the possibility that a bunker buster was fired from close range, but the obvious signs of explosive charges in front would not have been necessary.
A plane and a missile, synchronized? It does not add up.
Thank you. We are all here digging for the truth. The lack of landing gears , tires and tail section made this highly suspect from the photos we had seen. The small fin made me suspect cruise missile as the parking lot at the pentagon makes it difficult to maneuver in position even for experienced pilots. There is a possibility a cruise missile could appear to be a small plane to some witnesses. The fins would provide us the real answer. If they have it on the photo then they should have it as evidence.
sure... but I find it impossible to believe a large jetliner and a cruise missile could pass over and strike the Pentagon, simultaneously. I do reserve the possibility that a bunker buster was fired from close range, but the obvious signs of explosive charges in front would not have been necessary.
A plane and a missile, synchronized? It does not add up.