First off, she is highly intelligent. Several times, the interviewer made a misstatement and she quickly (and kindly) corrected it. Stupid people tend to not notice or correct things the way she did.

Second, even if she were a LARP or Black Hat psyop, the CONCEPT that she is conveying makes sense. If there is a Q Team, and if they are White Hat, and if they want to take down the evil globalist system, then OF COURSE they would be monitoring the thinking of the people, and especially the sheep, to understand what move to make next.

You could not possibly conduct such a mission without extensive intel on what people are thinking. Even low-life politicians have people conducting opinion polls and focus groups to figure out how they can manipulate their language to become frauds by saying things people want to hear.

Q Team would have to keep an eye on the pulse of the thinking out there, on all sides, to gather intel to know what steps to take next.

Globalists would have the same desire, but they are so arrogant in their little bubble world that they might not be so focused on this type of thing. They have been able to force things in the past. A group of people who wanted to do things more cleanly would need to understand the people.

Third, if they were to form a task force for this, she is an excellent candidate to recruit. If her background is the psychology of groups of employees in the business world, as it relates to mergers and acquisitions, she has experience trying to understand HOW people think and WHY they think what they do, and then providing reports of her analysis.

I was skeptical of her TV interview. Had never heard of her and didn't really believe her explanation of why she was saying Q talking points.

But this interview brought a lot of that out, and was very interesting.

Thanks, OP, for posting!