Chomsky, meanwhile, said in an email to the Journal that his association with Epstein is “none of your business. Or anyone’s. … I knew him and we met occasionally.”
“What was known about Jeffrey Epstein was that he had been convicted of a crime and had served his sentence,” Chomsky added. “According to U.S. laws and norms, that yields a clean slate.”
He has a right to make the claim he has made. But he has no right to stop witnesses from talking. And remember everything was recorded for leverage. There is evidence.
Chomsky, meanwhile, said in an email to the Journal that his association with Epstein is “none of your business. Or anyone’s. … I knew him and we met occasionally.”
“What was known about Jeffrey Epstein was that he had been convicted of a crime and had served his sentence,” Chomsky added. “According to U.S. laws and norms, that yields a clean slate.”
I've heard this Chomsky guy is a great debater.
And yet THIS is his logic.
So I went to wikipedia - and had the OIC moment.
He has a right to make the claim he has made. But he has no right to stop witnesses from talking. And remember everything was recorded for leverage. There is evidence.