Salty Cracker and Wall Street Apes are now insinuating it. The op was a success, they've created a narrative binary where either space lasers did it or climate change (MSM narrative) did it. Meanwhile the much more likely story (strategic arson ahead of high winds + collusion with crooked state and local officials to mishandle the response on purpose) has effectively been shoved under the rug. Now instead of having the entire internet digging into that to possibly find some arsonists or conspiracies to mishandle response, they are instead "laser focused" on space lasers.
Of course, if the DEW theory is correct, this is fine. I just don't think it is.
endrant
The smoke would follow the wind, so if the entire area was under a single current of wind, the smoke would reach that atmospheric height around the same time regardless of how long the fire had been going, resulting in an inaccurate picture of the fires "starting". Also yes, to achieve fire synergy and cause max damage I'd say lighting them all at the same time (say, 3pm everybody lights) would make sense. But there's no way to exactly pinpoint each fire's start time based on smoke which reaches such a height to be seen by sat
edit- your point is valid though, and one of the things that does give me pause on my stance against DEW narrative