From this PDW comment, could the dam be breaking? How do you introduce evidence legally? The time of "future proves past" where all are hard work pays off is right around the corner. People are starting to notice how hard we work and how much research we bring to the table. KEEP IT UP, FROGS!
(media.greatawakening.win)
🌎 WWG1WGAWW 🌍
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (56)
sorted by:
You can't. Because evidence and legality don't matter in a nation run by lying unjust tyrants who operate above the law.
Trump can bring mountains of evidence and jump through every legal hoop to present his case. It will all be dismissed because the ENTIRE system is run by people who hate him and want him gone. Exactly what makes you think they'll give him a fair chance?
All this could have been prevented if Trump used his powers as president to fix things, or as he says, "drain the swamp". There was a once in a 100 years chance to save America and it was wasted.
u/#q2786
Trump's ability to introduce evidence legally hinges on whether or not the trial in Georgia will be televised. If so, it will rival the OJ Simpson trial (and I would argue would, thanks to the internet, become a global phenomenon). If not, and it continues to be a kangaroo court, that will also bode well for Trump, although it would be more difficult. As it stands now, from what I understand, the plan is indeed to televise this trial. And what better place than Fulton county? It was an absolute shit show.
You are missing the Whole picture. How could Trump drain the swamp in a rigged system? He must be stealth and much smarter than the system trying to bring him down. This movie ain't over yet. Work on being informed and patient. Military is the only way.
If you want to save the system, you must work within the system to do it. If you have to go around the system, you prove the system is a failure. You prove the revolutionaries' point.
Just because they corrupt the system and abuse it doesn't mean we should do the same. If we believe that truth will win out, if we believe that a jury of 12 of our peers can indeed speak truth (which is what verdict means in its Latin roots), then we must speak truth and allow the system to work. This is a lawyer's argument, but it's right.
As for why Trump didn't get the Swamp drained in 4 years... you don't appreciate how deep and how vile the Swamp is. We didn't finish the race to the moon in 4 years either. Some projects are big enough they just take longer. Destroying the Old Families' control of the Western World is such a project.
There's still a lot more to do. No one could have accomplished it all. If you set an impossible standard, you will only find disappointment when no one can meet it.