Foods the USDA Warns Against v. World's Oldest Foods
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (77)
sorted by:
I've commented on this before. Around the 1900's they did a clinical trial where people milked dairy animals and exclusively drank the milk from the animals they milked for a whole month, with the exception of those who needed more solid foods like whole wheat bread and chicken soup in addition to the daily helping of a gallon of milk.
Immune systems were reset and people were healed of diabetes, crones disease, and some other 'untreatables.'
Where's the danger of raw milk from healthy animals really at?
There's probably little to no danger if you can consume it within a day or two after milking. I think the big problem comes when it has to be mass transported, packaged, and distributed to stores - by the time it would get to the consumers' tables, who knows what would be growing in it if it weren't pasteurized?
It's not profitable because of the potential for spoilage (shorter shelf life?). Pasteurized milk is "safe" ($$$) - for the milk industry!
Raw milk actually has a decent shelf-life, like you would expect milk to have. The problem is regulations heavily target raw milk dairies. While regular dairies can send their milk off to processing plants, most raw milk dairies have to swallow the expense of building their own bottling plants and have to rely on distribution methods such as people driving to the dairy itself to purchase it or shipping loads to co-ops.
It is outright illegal to sell raw milk in many states. It is safe, even according to government tests, but it would give competition to mega-dairies. Also, imagine if people could potentially, on their own, get enough to do a milk-diet for a month and possibly be healed from things like diabetes that otherwise requires a lifetime of medication. Who would lose out in that situation?
It is criminal what Big Corp is doing.