Why doesn't the MSM want to talk about Jan Halper Hayes?
(media.greatawakening.win)
🤡 All for a larp? 🤡
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (31)
sorted by:
She is such a nobody that Trump retruthed her interview.
You think Trump knows the people he retruths?
He's a guy who loves flattery.
enlighten me with evidence of some retruths or retweets where his show of support could be deemed loose ?
Do you think Trump really knows Sunny Nguyen from Truth Social?
https://truthsocial.com/@SunnyNguyen/110963584977529527
or @FruitSnacks, or @Lara47 or @STKOLBEOFPOLAND
And, of course, loose was not what I said.
I don't have Truth account and the link didn't work for me, perhaps because I don't have an account. therefore I didn't have the opportunity to do any research. I'm not adverse to being wrong but I think Jan is huge sign that the dam is breaking.
and if Trump retruthed this not really knowing her or what she actually discussed, why hasn't the corporate media or any of his political opponents attempted to capitalize on Trump's kooky retruth ? not a single peep I'm aware from anyone suggesting trump and jan are crazy conspiracy theorists
Doesn't seem like you've been paying attention.
Prior to becoming on a somebody on this community 25 days ago, she's been mentioned 3 times total on GAW. There was a total of 9 comments.
Was GAW paying attention to her in 2016 when she was saying Trump was psychologically unbalanced and or when she said this in 2017
She claimed that she gave Trump a psychological test. She claimed to be a member of Trump's transition team and 'a consultant to the Trump Transition" but she seems to have a history of exaggerating claims in the press.
She was going on multiple British TV shows claiming to be the VP of Republicans Overseas months after she left the group and they had to send her a cease and desist letter. http://republicansoverseas.com/wp-content/uploads/LettertoJanHalper-Hayes.pdf
If she was part of the Trump transition team, that should be a discoverable fact that would establish credibility.
She does have one of those donor/supporter photos with Trump. So perhaps she has some bona fides and I'm completely wrong.
https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/57adfd7797f0a6b1f3e58f90c32c1284da29c786/33_52_980_1224/master/980.jpg?width=445&dpr=2&s=none
An optics play? Seems like it to me.