Anna Von Reitz made a most interesting comment a few years ago as she was attempting to create a "People's Bank" outside the existing framework. She ultimately failed to do so however. She was in contact with high ranking military generals during this process. She said she finally got a 4 Star General on the phone after months of delays and obstacles and asked him point blank, "What is your prime directive as a 4 star general?"...and he responded "To maintain a 50/50 balance of good and bad in the world"...in this realm of DUALITY!!!
Quite a shocker, eh?
I'm of the opinion that this is what all the "secret societies" are charged with maintaining as well. Without them, things would not be as they are. Without "bad", there can be no "good". Everything would just "be as it is" without its opposite.
So in short, these secret societies manage both ends of the spectrum to keep the balance. There's no one secret society doing "all bad", while another does "all good".
It was only the very early "Q" that said the most interesting things. There are several levels of power above what was dropped as you correctly point out. Q's job was to attract the majority of "conspiracy theorists" into the fold. And the majority aren't clued into anything above and beyond the standard fare out there. So it was an appeal to the majority, nothing more.
Beyond minor details of hot political current events, Q didn't add any new intel to the deeper levels of "conspiracy theory" already well established. That's not to say the the Q team isn't aware or doesn't know all about these deeper levels. They just never said anything about them. It would have been too far outside the "believability" scale for the majority.
I'm of the opinion that the "early Q poster" was replaced in Feb/March 2018 though. Everything about the drops changed; the language, style, depth and degree of information being shared. A shift from "conspiratorial" to "political" in order to appeal to the widest audience possible.
Sure is, if hermetics floats your boat. I've studied much in this tradition, as well as many dozen others. They're all saying the same thing at the esoteric level. But most are still trapped in the cabal-sponsored mainstream exoteric interpretations.
Anna Von Reitz made a most interesting comment a few years ago as she was attempting to create a "People's Bank" outside the existing framework. She ultimately failed to do so however. She was in contact with high ranking military generals during this process. She said she finally got a 4 Star General on the phone after months of delays and obstacles and asked him point blank, "What is your prime directive as a 4 star general?"...and he responded "To maintain a 50/50 balance of good and bad in the world"...in this realm of DUALITY!!!
Quite a shocker, eh?
I'm of the opinion that this is what all the "secret societies" are charged with maintaining as well. Without them, things would not be as they are. Without "bad", there can be no "good". Everything would just "be as it is" without its opposite.
So in short, these secret societies manage both ends of the spectrum to keep the balance. There's no one secret society doing "all bad", while another does "all good".
It was only the very early "Q" that said the most interesting things. There are several levels of power above what was dropped as you correctly point out. Q's job was to attract the majority of "conspiracy theorists" into the fold. And the majority aren't clued into anything above and beyond the standard fare out there. So it was an appeal to the majority, nothing more.
Beyond minor details of hot political current events, Q didn't add any new intel to the deeper levels of "conspiracy theory" already well established. That's not to say the the Q team isn't aware or doesn't know all about these deeper levels. They just never said anything about them. It would have been too far outside the "believability" scale for the majority.
I'm of the opinion that the "early Q poster" was replaced in Feb/March 2018 though. Everything about the drops changed; the language, style, depth and degree of information being shared. A shift from "conspiratorial" to "political" in order to appeal to the widest audience possible.
Hermetics is a dig worth the time.
Sure is, if hermetics floats your boat. I've studied much in this tradition, as well as many dozen others. They're all saying the same thing at the esoteric level. But most are still trapped in the cabal-sponsored mainstream exoteric interpretations.