adjective
(of an argument or reaction) directed against a person rather than the position they are maintaining.
adverb
in a way that is directed against a person rather than the position they are maintaining.
Keeping this in mind, reread everything I wrote and you will understand that my arguement has always been against your position, not against you as a person (I don't even know you).
Except you didnt take any of my points and just said "this is illogical" and tried to say i was saying things i didnt (you asserted i called her a liar twice and i didnt) and then you go and say you dont know who we are talking about and want me to research for you (and in the same breath say you are thinking logically and im not).
You dont mention my points about her adding nothing to the convo and just relaying information, you just say "you arent thinking critically" which is absolutely ad hominem and not an argument or point and adds nothing to the conversation lol.
Just butting in to support FroagOnWin: Dr. Halper did get her information from Charlie Ward (the plane filled with gold claim), since he is the origin of that claim. You can look that up yourself, J. Sather wrote a lengthy substack tracking down where that claim came from. She's not just "saying the same thing as a liar, coincidentally". She's repeating his words and it's obvious. The question is why? Why is she repeating these theories that have flimsy to no evidence at all?
Look up what ad hominem means and reread this very post...
Keeping this in mind, reread everything I wrote and you will understand that my arguement has always been against your position, not against you as a person (I don't even know you).
Except you didnt take any of my points and just said "this is illogical" and tried to say i was saying things i didnt (you asserted i called her a liar twice and i didnt) and then you go and say you dont know who we are talking about and want me to research for you (and in the same breath say you are thinking logically and im not).
You dont mention my points about her adding nothing to the convo and just relaying information, you just say "you arent thinking critically" which is absolutely ad hominem and not an argument or point and adds nothing to the conversation lol.
And none of what you said is a personal attack, as you claimed.
Victimizing yourself wont get your point across, nor will it take you far here. This is not reddit.
If you had made this post before you claimed ad hominem, it would have given you a bit of credibility.
Just butting in to support FroagOnWin: Dr. Halper did get her information from Charlie Ward (the plane filled with gold claim), since he is the origin of that claim. You can look that up yourself, J. Sather wrote a lengthy substack tracking down where that claim came from. She's not just "saying the same thing as a liar, coincidentally". She's repeating his words and it's obvious. The question is why? Why is she repeating these theories that have flimsy to no evidence at all?
lmao ok dude, nice gaslight thanks for wasting my time. enjoy your catnip