adjective
(of an argument or reaction) directed against a person rather than the position they are maintaining.
adverb
in a way that is directed against a person rather than the position they are maintaining.
Keeping this in mind, reread everything I wrote and you will understand that my arguement has always been against your position, not against you as a person (I don't even know you).
Just butting in to support FroagOnWin: Dr. Halper did get her information from Charlie Ward (the plane filled with gold claim), since he is the origin of that claim. You can look that up yourself, J. Sather wrote a lengthy substack tracking down where that claim came from. She's not just "saying the same thing as a liar, coincidentally". She's repeating his words and it's obvious. The question is why? Why is she repeating these theories that have flimsy to no evidence at all?
Keeping this in mind, reread everything I wrote and you will understand that my arguement has always been against your position, not against you as a person (I don't even know you).
And none of what you said is a personal attack, as you claimed.
Victimizing yourself wont get your point across, nor will it take you far here. This is not reddit.
If you had made this post before you claimed ad hominem, it would have given you a bit of credibility.
Just butting in to support FroagOnWin: Dr. Halper did get her information from Charlie Ward (the plane filled with gold claim), since he is the origin of that claim. You can look that up yourself, J. Sather wrote a lengthy substack tracking down where that claim came from. She's not just "saying the same thing as a liar, coincidentally". She's repeating his words and it's obvious. The question is why? Why is she repeating these theories that have flimsy to no evidence at all?