I remember when everyone thought the Mueller investigation was a deep state psyop to protect the treasonous administration under Obama. Little did we know, behind the scenes there were Military Tribunals running simultaneously. - The Great Awakening

254

I remember when everyone thought the Mueller investigation was a deep state psyop to protect the treasonous administration under Obama. Little did we know, behind the scenes there were Military Tribunals running simultaneously.

posted 1 year ago by jhartz39 1 year ago by jhartz39 +257 / -3

u/#q260

The Mueller investigation ran from May 17, 2017, to March 22, 2019.

The Mueller report included references to 14 criminal investigations that were referred to other offices, 12 of which were completely redacted in the April 18 release.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mueller_report#:~:text=The%20Special%20Counsel%20investigation%20ran,which%20are%20still%20being%20tried.

NBC News: There appears, although the redacted documents do not make it completely clear, that there is a separate criminal investigation going on outside of Special Counsel Robert Mueller's purview for which Flynn has been providing significant assistance.

https://twitter.com/Tom_Winter/status/1070138096916799488

NBC News: Special Counsel Robert Mueller asks a judge for little to no jail time for Ret. Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn in exchanged for what they've described as his "substantial assistance" to their investigation.

https://twitter.com/Tom_Winter/status/1070140182907756544

"References to 14 criminal investigations that were REFERRED TO OTHER OFFICES." COMPLETELY REDACTED!!

Look below, "Think No Name" [Who died August 25, 2018]

Then read the next 10 lines.

PRECISION MILITARY PLANNING

u/#q2548

If No Name was investigated under one of the 14 completely redated criminal investigations and afterwards executed for treason, my question is who was investigated under the remaining 13 completely redated criminal investigations?

If No Name was executed for collaborating with the enemy (ISIS) and we know Obama himself created and protected ISIS, do you really think Obama is walking around as a free man?

This is why President Trump has remarked on many occasions how quickly he took out ISIS. Obama was protecting ISIS. HRC's personal assistant's father was part of Muslim Brotherhood and why Huma kept an "Insurance policy" for the unfortunate event that they were caught.

This is why President Trump says, "We caught them all!"

NCSWIS

WWG1WGA!!!

114 comments

114 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (114)

sorted by:

▲ 2 ▼

– TomPaineSentMe 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

EDIT jhartz correctly points out this are not the REFERRED CASES

https://greatawakening.win/p/17r990k9Bt/x/c/4TwT1OqLVQM

14 criminal investigations.....by now we know most of these. Here's the Americans and one ex-soviet who found guilty except the ex-soviet.

Accused....................Indictment Date  ...........................Initial Case status

1.  George Papadopoulos...3-Oct-17....................Pleaded guilty on October 5, 2017
2.
>Rick Gates..............27-Oct-17..............Pleaded guilty on February 23, 2018.
>Paul Manafort..............27-Oct-17..............Pleaded guilty on September 14, 2018. 

3.  Michael Flynn..............30-Nov-17..............Pleaded guilty on December 1, 2017

4.  Richard Pinedo..............7-Feb-18Pleaded guilty on February 12, 2018

5.  Alex van der Zwaan..............16-Feb-18Pleaded guilty on February 16, 2018.  
6.
>Rick Gates..............22-Feb-18.......Charges dismissed  February 27, 2018.
>Paul Manafort..............22-Feb-18..............Found guilty on 8 counts of 18,  August 21, 2018.

7.  Konstantin Kilimnik.............8-Jun-18.............At large outside U.S. jurisdiction

8.  Michael Cohen.............29-Nov-18.............Pleaded guilty on November 29, 2018. 

9.  Roger Stone.............24-Jan-19.............Found guilty on all counts on November 15, 2019.

permalink save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– jhartz39 [S] 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

"14 criminal investigations that were referred to other offices, 12 of which were completely redacted."

Were these cases you listed prosecuted under Mueller or other offices?

Were these cases completely redacted, no they were not.

If I were to guess those other offices is referring to Military tribunals.

The military justice system is a separate entity, nothing is leaked and explains why these cases were completely redacted.

What I was trying to convey with my post, there was a legal process going on behind the scenes that we were never told about and still remain unaware of.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 0 ▼

– TomPaineSentMe 0 points 1 year ago +1 / -1

Were these cases completely redacted, no they were not.

You're right I goofed. Big Time

I think I saw that 12/04/17 date in the red box and was think cases that came after that.

If I were to guess those other offices is referring to Military tribunals. The military justice system is a separate entity, nothing is leaked and explains why these cases were completely redacted.

If you read the Uniform Code of Military Justice, you will see that tribunals for civilians are excluded in 99.99% of federal crimes. There's a chapter on who is subject to the UCMJ and most Americans who are not in the military or committing a crime on a military base is exempt.

The military justice system is far more open than you imagine. In fact, the Consititution prohibits the kind of secrecy you mention https://www.jagcnet.army.mil/ACMPRS/cases/docket-case-list

I got about 6-8 of the redacted cases so far. I'll post in a bit.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– jhartz39 [S] 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

"you will see that tribunals for civilians are excluded in 99.99% of federal crimes."

Firstly, both GWHB and No Name were in the military.

Yes, I agree with you under normal conditions.

The running theory is we are in Devolution.

If Trump signed the Insurrection Act, the military takes over and the rules change.

Invoking the Insurrection Act temporarily suspends the Posse Comitatus rule and allows the president to deploy the military to assist civilian authorities with law enforcement. That might involve soldiers doing anything from enforcing a federal court order to suppressing an uprising against the government.

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/insurrection-act-explained#:~:text=Invoking%20the%20Insurrection%20Act%20temporarily,an%20uprising%20against%20the%20government.

President also has PEADS he can use, who knows what is in those?

I know the Durham cases came after Mueller however, I think the cases Durham took to Washington DC was done intentionally to show our court systems are corrupt and the argument can be made that the military needs to step in.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 0 ▼

– TomPaineSentMe 0 points 1 year ago +1 / -1

Firstly, both GWHB and No Name were in the military.

So was Joe Biggs https://www.military.com/daily-news/2023/08/31/army-veteran-who-was-proud-boys-organizer-gets-17-years-prison-role-jan-6-capitol-riot.html

The running theory is we are in Devolution.

Eh.

If Trump signed the Insurrection Act, the military takes over and the rules change.

But he didn't. And also from that link you sent.

Is invoking the Insurrection Act the same as declaring martial law? The Insurrection Act does not authorize martial law. The term “martial law” has no established definition, but it is generally understood as a power that allows the military to take over the role of civilian government in an emergency. By contrast, the Insurrection Act generally permits the military to assist civilian authorities (whether state or federal), not take their place. Under current law, the president has no authority to declare martial law.

by the way I finished my reply to you. I got 8 maybe 11 of the 14.

permalink parent save report block reply

... continue reading thread?