I remember when everyone thought the Mueller investigation was a deep state psyop to protect the treasonous administration under Obama. Little did we know, behind the scenes there were Military Tribunals running simultaneously. - The Great Awakening

254

I remember when everyone thought the Mueller investigation was a deep state psyop to protect the treasonous administration under Obama. Little did we know, behind the scenes there were Military Tribunals running simultaneously.

posted 1 year ago by jhartz39 1 year ago by jhartz39 +257 / -3

u/#q260

The Mueller investigation ran from May 17, 2017, to March 22, 2019.

The Mueller report included references to 14 criminal investigations that were referred to other offices, 12 of which were completely redacted in the April 18 release.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mueller_report#:~:text=The%20Special%20Counsel%20investigation%20ran,which%20are%20still%20being%20tried.

NBC News: There appears, although the redacted documents do not make it completely clear, that there is a separate criminal investigation going on outside of Special Counsel Robert Mueller's purview for which Flynn has been providing significant assistance.

https://twitter.com/Tom_Winter/status/1070138096916799488

NBC News: Special Counsel Robert Mueller asks a judge for little to no jail time for Ret. Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn in exchanged for what they've described as his "substantial assistance" to their investigation.

https://twitter.com/Tom_Winter/status/1070140182907756544

"References to 14 criminal investigations that were REFERRED TO OTHER OFFICES." COMPLETELY REDACTED!!

Look below, "Think No Name" [Who died August 25, 2018]

Then read the next 10 lines.

PRECISION MILITARY PLANNING

u/#q2548

If No Name was investigated under one of the 14 completely redated criminal investigations and afterwards executed for treason, my question is who was investigated under the remaining 13 completely redated criminal investigations?

If No Name was executed for collaborating with the enemy (ISIS) and we know Obama himself created and protected ISIS, do you really think Obama is walking around as a free man?

This is why President Trump has remarked on many occasions how quickly he took out ISIS. Obama was protecting ISIS. HRC's personal assistant's father was part of Muslim Brotherhood and why Huma kept an "Insurance policy" for the unfortunate event that they were caught.

This is why President Trump says, "We caught them all!"

NCSWIS

WWG1WGA!!!

114 comments

114 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (114)

sorted by:

▲ 1 ▼

– jhartz39 [S] 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

"you will see that tribunals for civilians are excluded in 99.99% of federal crimes."

Firstly, both GWHB and No Name were in the military.

Yes, I agree with you under normal conditions.

The running theory is we are in Devolution.

If Trump signed the Insurrection Act, the military takes over and the rules change.

Invoking the Insurrection Act temporarily suspends the Posse Comitatus rule and allows the president to deploy the military to assist civilian authorities with law enforcement. That might involve soldiers doing anything from enforcing a federal court order to suppressing an uprising against the government.

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/insurrection-act-explained#:~:text=Invoking%20the%20Insurrection%20Act%20temporarily,an%20uprising%20against%20the%20government.

President also has PEADS he can use, who knows what is in those?

I know the Durham cases came after Mueller however, I think the cases Durham took to Washington DC was done intentionally to show our court systems are corrupt and the argument can be made that the military needs to step in.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 0 ▼

– TomPaineSentMe 0 points 1 year ago +1 / -1

Firstly, both GWHB and No Name were in the military.

So was Joe Biggs https://www.military.com/daily-news/2023/08/31/army-veteran-who-was-proud-boys-organizer-gets-17-years-prison-role-jan-6-capitol-riot.html

The running theory is we are in Devolution.

Eh.

If Trump signed the Insurrection Act, the military takes over and the rules change.

But he didn't. And also from that link you sent.

Is invoking the Insurrection Act the same as declaring martial law? The Insurrection Act does not authorize martial law. The term “martial law” has no established definition, but it is generally understood as a power that allows the military to take over the role of civilian government in an emergency. By contrast, the Insurrection Act generally permits the military to assist civilian authorities (whether state or federal), not take their place. Under current law, the president has no authority to declare martial law.

by the way I finished my reply to you. I got 8 maybe 11 of the 14.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– jhartz39 [S] 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Look at the "Law of War" section here.

https://www.lawsuitlegal.com/military-law/can-civilians-be-tried-in-military-court.php

Trump is commander in Chief, he is control of the military.

Gets back to the Occupiers and occupied territory.

I think given that China assisted Biden in the election fraud. Law of War applies.

I remember writing about the Geneva Convention rules couple years ago, the Biden admin has violated all of them.

I strongly believe the military is in subvert control of the country, how Trump placed them in that position is anyone's guess.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ -2 ▼

– TomPaineSentMe -2 points 1 year ago +1 / -3

The US not occupied territory. Our governments, courts and law enforcement are functioning normally. You may want to think so, but it just ain't so.

Trump is commander in Chief, he is control of the military.

Not according the Constitution.

Look at the "Law of War" section here.

This is precisely what I am talking about “Can military law apply to civilians?” The short answer is yes, but only under special circumstances.

Without the declaration of martial law, civilians in the United States can’t be tried under the military courts.

So we don't have that circumstance.

We don't have this circumstance for most civilians

Civiliians serving with, employed by, or accompanying the armed forces

https://www.liveabout.com/punitive-articles-of-the-ucmj-3356861

This is a better explainer of it.

permalink parent save report block reply