Here's my logic:
1.) If a kid drew it they give credit to the kid - hey everyone Jimmy from classroom 5A made this drawing and it's now the cover of the yearbook - yay Jimmy - doesn't sound like that is happening here
2.) If an adult made it and they're trying to make it as though a student submitted it - they write letters backwards, make it look less polished intentionally, etc. This drawing has some complexity to it and could include some pedo symbology. That's beyond your typical kid artwork. Now some of those symbols could be a kid mimicking drawings they have seen in the past, but I'm just getting a vibe that this was an adult doing this and then saying "it was totally a kid". I don't see many kids having a mastery of the many many different symbols for male, female, runish drawings that's in the clouds of the drawing.
Here's my logic: 1.) If a kid drew it they give credit to the kid - hey everyone Jimmy from classroom 5A made this drawing and it's now the cover of the yearbook - yay Jimmy - doesn't sound like that is happening here 2.) If an adult made it and they're trying to make it as though a student submitted it - they write letters backwards, make it look less polished intentionally, etc. This drawing has some complexity to it and could include some pedo symbology. That's beyond your typical kid artwork. Now some of those symbols could be a kid mimicking drawings they have seen in the past, but I'm just getting a vibe that this was an adult doing this and then saying "it was totally a kid". I don't see many kids having a mastery of the many many different symbols for male, female, runish drawings that's in the clouds of the drawing.