In a potential signal of shifting attitudes on how the war in Ukraine is covered in the legacy media, the New York Times is starting to slowly acknowledge the endemic corruption that has been a defining feature of the former Soviet state as officials have admitted that money for military contracts has “vanished”.
It didnt vanish, it was 'laundered' and then sent back to cronies in DC. Everyone who knows anything about Ukraine, KNOWS this is one of the main criminal activities among many that occur there.
In a potential signal of shifting attitudes on how the war in Ukraine is covered in the legacy media, the New York Times is starting to slowly acknowledge the endemic corruption that has been a defining feature of the former Soviet state as officials have admitted that money for military contracts has “vanished”.
I feel like September may be hotter than August.
I have the same feeling.
It didnt vanish, it was 'laundered' and then sent back to cronies in DC. Everyone who knows anything about Ukraine, KNOWS this is one of the main criminal activities among many that occur there.
No, tell the truth. Money doesn't vanish, it is stolen.
vanished into bank accounts. Look at all the mansions the politicians in the Ukraine are buying lately.