Most scientists who are doing anything advanced are prostituting themselves to some extent, because they don't have the fancy equipment, the computer power, the student slaveys and test subjects, the friends to do the statistics, the money to pay for help and publishing, and so on. It's either work for an industry and find the answers they want, or work for a university and find the answers their grant donors want. They also have to put up with a media system (journals) that is just as compromised in its own way as network news, and probably in cahoots with the MSM. The world needs some revolution in financing to break this information stranglehold.
Not a scientist then, at best a liar, at worst a prostitute.
Most scientists who are doing anything advanced are prostituting themselves to some extent, because they don't have the fancy equipment, the computer power, the student slaveys and test subjects, the friends to do the statistics, the money to pay for help and publishing, and so on. It's either work for an industry and find the answers they want, or work for a university and find the answers their grant donors want. They also have to put up with a media system (journals) that is just as compromised in its own way as network news, and probably in cahoots with the MSM. The world needs some revolution in financing to break this information stranglehold.