Your comment straddles the bar between a humorous quip well played and a serious comment with pronounced attitude overtones.
It is opaque. Ambiguous. How do I know? I know. Ask me how I know. (No seriously. Ask me how I know. Knock and the door will be opened. Ask, and you shall receive.)
On a side note, I hear tidbits about this woman having multiple personalities. If this is indeed the case, it could well explain why the personality in the OP clip is like she is. I watched some of her interview with Peters, and found her personality to be markedly different in that.
In any case, the Peters interview is years old, and while it's completely valid not to dismiss any report of this sort of stuff out of hand (we know that it exists), I also think its important to not let one's discernment guard down.
How do I know? I don't. It's an opinion, not a fact!
Pardon me but your assessment is wrong. How do I know? Because I know. Ask me how I know.
Your comment straddles the bar between a humorous quip well played and a serious comment with pronounced attitude overtones.
It is opaque. Ambiguous. How do I know? I know. Ask me how I know. (No seriously. Ask me how I know. Knock and the door will be opened. Ask, and you shall receive.)
On a side note, I hear tidbits about this woman having multiple personalities. If this is indeed the case, it could well explain why the personality in the OP clip is like she is. I watched some of her interview with Peters, and found her personality to be markedly different in that.
In any case, the Peters interview is years old, and while it's completely valid not to dismiss any report of this sort of stuff out of hand (we know that it exists), I also think its important to not let one's discernment guard down.
How do I know? I don't. It's an opinion, not a fact!