From the date the fire on Maui was made public I noticed an increase in professional opinions here, regarding the events. Many new accounts and not so new accounts came out in full force giving cookie cutter explanations for what happened, including some who claim to have worked on DEW. Or saying that lasers couldn’t be the cause of the fire, while also ignoring that visible lasers are not the only form of DEW capability. Some use lasers, some use microwaves, some use gamaray, some use pressure waves/sound, some use X-rays.. but they all focused in on lasers and why there was no way it could have been that. Reminds me of the guy in the black shirt doing that interview on the street shortly after the World Trade Center collapse, dude had the entire scripted story ready to go while people where still trying to make sense of what happened.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (88)
sorted by:
Well, what I mean is that if a mod is being effective, and they can justify their decisions, then they might conceivably be a spy, but they aren't a functional glowie.
We discuss and argue things out on a daily basis and losing the argument means you really have to reverse your decision. We discuss and review all areas including how to handle posts like this one which, as you can see, is causing ripples for us.
Thanks for the apology.
Moderating here is harder than you might think.
I get it completely. But I hope you see the post and my message for what it is. Insightful and meant to shine light in dark places. We all might have negative consequences for our actions even when those actions are coming from a positive place.
Dammed if you do, dammed if you don’t.