This is obviously fake, the "artist" tried to simulate the "rgb pixels" wrongly, on the left part of the image they are vertical when on the right side (the 'shopped one) they are angled. Also there is no trace of this picture prior 2016 and yet the story is true.
Yeah, you can really see the left/right difference in the hires picture link. The right side has the look of an interlaced TV image capture, pasted onto the side of the truck. It's been tilted making the rasters angled so the skyline is level with the truck.
I wonder what that part would turn up on tineye if it were clipped out and rotated back to it's original orientation...
EDIT. After a moment's thought. The skyline bits are more likely captured from a camera shot of an interlaced computer screen. Not necessarily TV.
This is obviously fake, the "artist" tried to simulate the "rgb pixels" wrongly, on the left part of the image they are vertical when on the right side (the 'shopped one) they are angled. Also there is no trace of this picture prior 2016 and yet the story is true.
tineye:
https://tineye.com/search/323a2837a42d40d7fe7f4e09bddff29c70aafd8d?sort=crawl_date&order=asc&page=1
The fbi report:
https://www.israellobby.org/urbanmoving/1169683-001%20---%20303C-PH-C91946-Serial%202%20---%20Section%201%20(1037749).pdf
Yeah, you can really see the left/right difference in the hires picture link. The right side has the look of an interlaced TV image capture, pasted onto the side of the truck. It's been tilted making the rasters angled so the skyline is level with the truck.
I wonder what that part would turn up on tineye if it were clipped out and rotated back to it's original orientation...
EDIT. After a moment's thought. The skyline bits are more likely captured from a camera shot of an interlaced computer screen. Not necessarily TV.