What did you mean by cell cameras...in 2001? And can you rule out the possibility that any video release after the fact, i.e. not live, could have been produced and seeded by professionals in the intelligence community?
I didn't downvote, but camera phones came out in 1999. By 2003, more camera phones were sold than digital cameras. It took a couple years to get to that point, so yeah, late 2001...whether they were using a phone or camera, the exact same point still stands. Too many versions, of varying type and quality, from too many angles, to all be set up. (How many coincidences before it becomes mathematically impossible? :)
Lots of eyewitnesses visually saw the planes hitting the buildings. Can you rule out the possibility that one or more of them was a normal person telling the truth, and not an FBI agent?
Not a huge deal, but Im highly dubious that ANY cell phone camera had the ability to capture any video worth sharing of the events. When it comes to other cameras, perhaps camcorders...how much looking have you done to find the many angles that you propose? How many do you think exist?
Your statement that lots of eyewitnesses visually saw planes hitting buildings - this statement can not be verified, can it? And for those that did see something, did they see a 757 going nearly 600 mph? How could that possibly be verified? If they were close to the towers, visibility would have been limited by by tall buildings, not to mention smoke from the first tower. People viewing from afar also have a visibility issue. I contend it's possible that most people saw the explosion, later saw the videos, and their mind filled in the blanks.
Can I rule out the possibility that normal people were telling the truth? No, but with so many coincidences and outright lies surrounding the events, I take nothing for granted.
What did you mean by cell cameras...in 2001? And can you rule out the possibility that any video release after the fact, i.e. not live, could have been produced and seeded by professionals in the intelligence community?
I didn't downvote, but camera phones came out in 1999. By 2003, more camera phones were sold than digital cameras. It took a couple years to get to that point, so yeah, late 2001...whether they were using a phone or camera, the exact same point still stands. Too many versions, of varying type and quality, from too many angles, to all be set up. (How many coincidences before it becomes mathematically impossible? :)
Lots of eyewitnesses visually saw the planes hitting the buildings. Can you rule out the possibility that one or more of them was a normal person telling the truth, and not an FBI agent?
My college roommate saw the 2nd plane hit- she had clients in the towers :-( She FELT it
Not a huge deal, but Im highly dubious that ANY cell phone camera had the ability to capture any video worth sharing of the events. When it comes to other cameras, perhaps camcorders...how much looking have you done to find the many angles that you propose? How many do you think exist?
Your statement that lots of eyewitnesses visually saw planes hitting buildings - this statement can not be verified, can it? And for those that did see something, did they see a 757 going nearly 600 mph? How could that possibly be verified? If they were close to the towers, visibility would have been limited by by tall buildings, not to mention smoke from the first tower. People viewing from afar also have a visibility issue. I contend it's possible that most people saw the explosion, later saw the videos, and their mind filled in the blanks.
Can I rule out the possibility that normal people were telling the truth? No, but with so many coincidences and outright lies surrounding the events, I take nothing for granted.