Planes can be removed from video just as easily as they can be added
and
Planes flying into buildings were caught from at least a dozen different angles by regular cell cameras as well as "news" cameras
and
SEALS found in bin Laden's lair the notebooks describing a plan for ten aircraft hitting targets all over the US on 9/11, but bin Laden lowered it to just four because of logistics and timing. There's video of him in his hideout with the radio on, announcing the attacks, holding up four fingers, one at a time, just before each announcement of impact (it's fair to ask for sauce but I don't have it, just remember watching the vid a couple of times in a row - I don't have a good system to save everything important I see just in case I might post about it later, but it's still fair to request sauce and opine that its lack means the info is fake)
so
it's credible that the hijackers still did the deed but were aided and abetted by C_A
but
Bldg 7? Come on, man, they dropped that one without concocting any explanation to use later for it. It also looks like you can see tiny explosions at the corners of Towers 1 and 2. But that doesn't mean no planes flew into it. They did. Those "not-all" muslims famously took flying lessons in Florida, but showed no interest in takeoff and landing, for a reason. They did their little jihad, and they were just willing pawns of the deepstate. Both of those things can be true.
What did you mean by cell cameras...in 2001? And can you rule out the possibility that any video release after the fact, i.e. not live, could have been produced and seeded by professionals in the intelligence community?
I didn't downvote, but camera phones came out in 1999. By 2003, more camera phones were sold than digital cameras. It took a couple years to get to that point, so yeah, late 2001...whether they were using a phone or camera, the exact same point still stands. Too many versions, of varying type and quality, from too many angles, to all be set up. (How many coincidences before it becomes mathematically impossible? :)
Lots of eyewitnesses visually saw the planes hitting the buildings. Can you rule out the possibility that one or more of them was a normal person telling the truth, and not an FBI agent?
Not a huge deal, but Im highly dubious that ANY cell phone camera had the ability to capture any video worth sharing of the events. When it comes to other cameras, perhaps camcorders...how much looking have you done to find the many angles that you propose? How many do you think exist?
Your statement that lots of eyewitnesses visually saw planes hitting buildings - this statement can not be verified, can it? And for those that did see something, did they see a 757 going nearly 600 mph? How could that possibly be verified? If they were close to the towers, visibility would have been limited by by tall buildings, not to mention smoke from the first tower. People viewing from afar also have a visibility issue. I contend it's possible that most people saw the explosion, later saw the videos, and their mind filled in the blanks.
Can I rule out the possibility that normal people were telling the truth? No, but with so many coincidences and outright lies surrounding the events, I take nothing for granted.
Just a few things
Planes can be removed from video just as easily as they can be added
and
Planes flying into buildings were caught from at least a dozen different angles by regular cell cameras as well as "news" cameras
and
SEALS found in bin Laden's lair the notebooks describing a plan for ten aircraft hitting targets all over the US on 9/11, but bin Laden lowered it to just four because of logistics and timing. There's video of him in his hideout with the radio on, announcing the attacks, holding up four fingers, one at a time, just before each announcement of impact (it's fair to ask for sauce but I don't have it, just remember watching the vid a couple of times in a row - I don't have a good system to save everything important I see just in case I might post about it later, but it's still fair to request sauce and opine that its lack means the info is fake)
so
it's credible that the hijackers still did the deed but were aided and abetted by C_A
but
Bldg 7? Come on, man, they dropped that one without concocting any explanation to use later for it. It also looks like you can see tiny explosions at the corners of Towers 1 and 2. But that doesn't mean no planes flew into it. They did. Those "not-all" muslims famously took flying lessons in Florida, but showed no interest in takeoff and landing, for a reason. They did their little jihad, and they were just willing pawns of the deepstate. Both of those things can be true.
What did you mean by cell cameras...in 2001? And can you rule out the possibility that any video release after the fact, i.e. not live, could have been produced and seeded by professionals in the intelligence community?
I didn't downvote, but camera phones came out in 1999. By 2003, more camera phones were sold than digital cameras. It took a couple years to get to that point, so yeah, late 2001...whether they were using a phone or camera, the exact same point still stands. Too many versions, of varying type and quality, from too many angles, to all be set up. (How many coincidences before it becomes mathematically impossible? :)
Lots of eyewitnesses visually saw the planes hitting the buildings. Can you rule out the possibility that one or more of them was a normal person telling the truth, and not an FBI agent?
My college roommate saw the 2nd plane hit- she had clients in the towers :-( She FELT it
Not a huge deal, but Im highly dubious that ANY cell phone camera had the ability to capture any video worth sharing of the events. When it comes to other cameras, perhaps camcorders...how much looking have you done to find the many angles that you propose? How many do you think exist?
Your statement that lots of eyewitnesses visually saw planes hitting buildings - this statement can not be verified, can it? And for those that did see something, did they see a 757 going nearly 600 mph? How could that possibly be verified? If they were close to the towers, visibility would have been limited by by tall buildings, not to mention smoke from the first tower. People viewing from afar also have a visibility issue. I contend it's possible that most people saw the explosion, later saw the videos, and their mind filled in the blanks.
Can I rule out the possibility that normal people were telling the truth? No, but with so many coincidences and outright lies surrounding the events, I take nothing for granted.