7 was such an obvious tell for me since it was outside of what was otherwise the square perimeter of WTC complex. What are the chances that if any surrounding building in that area was going to succumb to totally catastrophic damage, it would have been the only remaining WTC one.
They did great graphic of the planes for me on tv, but to just be able to figure out that jet fuel could not have burned like that to collapsed those two buildings would not have convinced me at first. It gave me doubts but when I saw 7. That's when I knew there was something funky with their explanation.
I saw a version of the planes hitting the towers where a nose cone of a plane comes clear out the other side of the building. The nose cone, which is dented by geese, went through all that steel?
That convinced me the "planes" were a telegraphic like the stats and scores they flip up on screen during sports events.
I saw a video on youtube a long time after the fact. A "little known" angle of the attacks shot from a helicopter. In this video the towers are dead center in the shot when the plane hits. You can see the nose of the plane portrude through the tower as the camera angle slightly drifts from being centered on the towers. The theory goes that it's a "infographic" programmed to fly the "plane" to the middle of the screen being shown on that camera, then disappear. Since the helicopter drifted the angle so the towers were slightly off-center, the "plane" graphic flew a little further than it should have and is visible out the other side of the tower. It's interesting because if you draw a center-line on the shot, the nose portrudes through exactly to the amount that it would need to, to be centered. I bet the video is still out there somewhere
7 was such an obvious tell for me since it was outside of what was otherwise the square perimeter of WTC complex. What are the chances that if any surrounding building in that area was going to succumb to totally catastrophic damage, it would have been the only remaining WTC one.
They did great graphic of the planes for me on tv, but to just be able to figure out that jet fuel could not have burned like that to collapsed those two buildings would not have convinced me at first. It gave me doubts but when I saw 7. That's when I knew there was something funky with their explanation.
I saw a version of the planes hitting the towers where a nose cone of a plane comes clear out the other side of the building. The nose cone, which is dented by geese, went through all that steel? That convinced me the "planes" were a telegraphic like the stats and scores they flip up on screen during sports events.
Oh you saw that? I had to go to work. I did not see anything like that.
I saw a video on youtube a long time after the fact. A "little known" angle of the attacks shot from a helicopter. In this video the towers are dead center in the shot when the plane hits. You can see the nose of the plane portrude through the tower as the camera angle slightly drifts from being centered on the towers. The theory goes that it's a "infographic" programmed to fly the "plane" to the middle of the screen being shown on that camera, then disappear. Since the helicopter drifted the angle so the towers were slightly off-center, the "plane" graphic flew a little further than it should have and is visible out the other side of the tower. It's interesting because if you draw a center-line on the shot, the nose portrudes through exactly to the amount that it would need to, to be centered. I bet the video is still out there somewhere