You'd think a competent host would have probed that a little bit. Ask her for specifics. If she's going to allege lies and fraud, ask her to back it up. You'd be amazed how many people will complain about that, but they base only on a feeling. They can't actually articulate what was factually incorrect.
If these people had any confidence in their world view, they'd let her talk. She's already got crazy eyes, so test her and see what she says. Of course, they know they lied and that's why they can't allow people to even broach the subject. The host can't defend what they did, or isn't corrupt enough to lie again to reinforce the original lie.
Regardless, the censorship never looks good. It's an unforced error; a coward's play.
You'd think a competent host would have probed that a little bit. Ask her for specifics. If she's going to allege lies and fraud, ask her to back it up. You'd be amazed how many people will complain about that, but they base only on a feeling. They can't actually articulate what was factually incorrect.
If these people had any confidence in their world view, they'd let her talk. She's already got crazy eyes, so test her and see what she says. Of course, they know they lied and that's why they can't allow people to even broach the subject. The host can't defend what they did, or isn't corrupt enough to lie again to reinforce the original lie.
Regardless, the censorship never looks good. It's an unforced error; a coward's play.
You're correct. A competent host/journalist would probe into what she was saying.
Those "journalists" don't care about getting the truth of the matter, not when they've been covering up and lying.
I don't think she has crazy eyes... Lol