Go to the scotty Mar video. OF COURSE he will deny it. BUT. The documentarian made a copy right claim on it and it cant be done without RAW footage. YOU CAN DCMA footage from AI. DCMA confirmed this footage.
Doesn't make sense Stone is still battling all the legal troubles from his raid and being sapped financially trying to defend Trump if that video were authentic. Guess we'll see as this movie plays out.
If I was the deepstate that would be my cover story too!
Matthew 7:15-20
You Will Know Them by Their Fruits
15 “Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves. 16 You will know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes from thornbushes or figs from thistles? 17 Even so, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. 18 A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a bad tree bear good fruit. 19 Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. 20 Therefore by their fruits you will know them.
This scotty "proof" looks like it hinges entirely on the assertion the DMCA and documentarian both are iron clad. DMCA claims are just as malleable as anything these days and the Danes side with JB so this proof is not absolute and already raises red flags IMHO. I'll file this info as interesting but I'm not swayed.
Thats fine. But DCMA requires some proof. The footage is entirely compelling and ive NEVER, seen a AI video so accurate. Show me one that you can find of a celebrity or person talking as candidly and accurately as such, when you see full body motion and movement and not just a head / mouth piece.
You have a paper trail. Not just DCMA. You have the Documentarian RELEASING this footage. You have HIM making the DCMA claim. Its not a nobody. It didnt come out of the magic of the internet.
I knew when we got close to the truth people will come on these sites and on Reddit and say videos which are real are actually fake.
This is truth- DMCA claims come down to whoever's lawyer is better, basically. We run an online business and have firsthand experience with this as a product of our design was taken down by a claim made by a competitor that the intellectual property belonged to him. It did not, btw, and we did eventually win and have our item restored. Pretty much anyone can file a claim with a platform (be it a sales platform or social media) and say, "this is mine" and that platform will remove the disputed item due to the claim, NOT due to any proof or documentation. Then as the fight progresses it can be restored or not- sometimes multiple times- depending on how the fight goes. So until the fight over this video is over, you can't really know anything based on the DMCA claims and even then it may be just who ran out of money first, not actual legal proof.
My gut tells me that Stone has been bad in the past, but I'm willing to give him a chance basically because of the Christians he's speaking with and what he is saying and doing NOW. I am a Christian and I'm sure that that has something to do with my opinion, but I'm always happy to see anyone make a change. Believing that if someone does something bad or have been bad at one time that they'll always BE bad goes against the very basis of Christianity and forgiveness. We can all be redeemed and change. It may be a ploy on his part, it may not be a ploy- I don't know. I'm not God. It's not for me to cancel someone who may be trying to do better without seeing how things play out. To me it seems like he's been awfully attacked by the left and and is very much still hated by them, so he has to pose at least some sort of threat to them somehow. Maybe it's what he knows, maybe it's something else. But I'll choose to extend a chance to someone who is publicly trying to do better until I see recent evidence that it's false, not something that is years old, whether it's real or not.
Go to the scotty Mar video. OF COURSE he will deny it. BUT. The documentarian made a copy right claim on it and it cant be done without RAW footage. YOU CAN DCMA footage from AI. DCMA confirmed this footage.
The Flood is coming. Its about to get WILD!
Doesn't make sense Stone is still battling all the legal troubles from his raid and being sapped financially trying to defend Trump if that video were authentic. Guess we'll see as this movie plays out.
If I was the deepstate that would be my cover story too!
Matthew 7:15-20
You Will Know Them by Their Fruits
15 “Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves. 16 You will know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes from thornbushes or figs from thistles? 17 Even so, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. 18 A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a bad tree bear good fruit. 19 Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. 20 Therefore by their fruits you will know them.
This scotty "proof" looks like it hinges entirely on the assertion the DMCA and documentarian both are iron clad. DMCA claims are just as malleable as anything these days and the Danes side with JB so this proof is not absolute and already raises red flags IMHO. I'll file this info as interesting but I'm not swayed.
Thats fine. But DCMA requires some proof. The footage is entirely compelling and ive NEVER, seen a AI video so accurate. Show me one that you can find of a celebrity or person talking as candidly and accurately as such, when you see full body motion and movement and not just a head / mouth piece.
You have a paper trail. Not just DCMA. You have the Documentarian RELEASING this footage. You have HIM making the DCMA claim. Its not a nobody. It didnt come out of the magic of the internet.
I knew when we got close to the truth people will come on these sites and on Reddit and say videos which are real are actually fake.
This is truth- DMCA claims come down to whoever's lawyer is better, basically. We run an online business and have firsthand experience with this as a product of our design was taken down by a claim made by a competitor that the intellectual property belonged to him. It did not, btw, and we did eventually win and have our item restored. Pretty much anyone can file a claim with a platform (be it a sales platform or social media) and say, "this is mine" and that platform will remove the disputed item due to the claim, NOT due to any proof or documentation. Then as the fight progresses it can be restored or not- sometimes multiple times- depending on how the fight goes. So until the fight over this video is over, you can't really know anything based on the DMCA claims and even then it may be just who ran out of money first, not actual legal proof.
My gut tells me that Stone has been bad in the past, but I'm willing to give him a chance basically because of the Christians he's speaking with and what he is saying and doing NOW. I am a Christian and I'm sure that that has something to do with my opinion, but I'm always happy to see anyone make a change. Believing that if someone does something bad or have been bad at one time that they'll always BE bad goes against the very basis of Christianity and forgiveness. We can all be redeemed and change. It may be a ploy on his part, it may not be a ploy- I don't know. I'm not God. It's not for me to cancel someone who may be trying to do better without seeing how things play out. To me it seems like he's been awfully attacked by the left and and is very much still hated by them, so he has to pose at least some sort of threat to them somehow. Maybe it's what he knows, maybe it's something else. But I'll choose to extend a chance to someone who is publicly trying to do better until I see recent evidence that it's false, not something that is years old, whether it's real or not.
Look at the FBI informants on J6. They cooperated and still got lengthy prison sentences.