Here’s what Trending Politics co-founder Collin Rugg shared on X:
NEW: ABC News producer John Santucci is appalled at how “bad” Fani Willis’ case against Trump is, admits she is just “throwing things against the wall.”
You know it’s bad when even the main stream media is admitting it.
Santucci also mentioned how Trump scored a big win after the judge denied Willis’ motion to try all 19 co-defendants at once,
“Bad. I mean, Fani Willis wasn’t there… she’s throwing things against the wall based on this hearing.”
“A great win for Donald Trump and others that did not want to be part of this speedy trial case.”
“I can tell you, sitting here with you, just texting with some of the attorneys involved in the other defendants celebrating. Yay victory!”
The trial could never be legal anyways. There's no one in the country who isn't biased for or against Trump. A jury of 12 is never going to be unbiased, nor will every single one of them be a Trump-hater - every single one of them will end in a mistrial because the jury will have made up their minds before the case begins. If he's convicted in any of these cases, then the jury was illegally selected and/or tampered with.
Grand juries are a bit different though. They are done in a private setting, ie easier to do shady shit. Trial juries are picked by both the prosecution and the defense, and it's played out in the open.
Here’s what Trending Politics co-founder Collin Rugg shared on X:
NEW: ABC News producer John Santucci is appalled at how “bad” Fani Willis’ case against Trump is, admits she is just “throwing things against the wall.”
You know it’s bad when even the main stream media is admitting it.
Santucci also mentioned how Trump scored a big win after the judge denied Willis’ motion to try all 19 co-defendants at once,
“Bad. I mean, Fani Willis wasn’t there… she’s throwing things against the wall based on this hearing.”
“A great win for Donald Trump and others that did not want to be part of this speedy trial case.”
“I can tell you, sitting here with you, just texting with some of the attorneys involved in the other defendants celebrating. Yay victory!”
She doesn't need a good case, if the judge and jury are stacked in her favor.
Never underestimate public pressure!
One or two more decisions like this and it won't even get to trial, judge and jury are moot.
The trial could never be legal anyways. There's no one in the country who isn't biased for or against Trump. A jury of 12 is never going to be unbiased, nor will every single one of them be a Trump-hater - every single one of them will end in a mistrial because the jury will have made up their minds before the case begins. If he's convicted in any of these cases, then the jury was illegally selected and/or tampered with.
These grand juries have already indicted him. So... it seems that they are good at picking the people they want for these things.
Grand juries are a bit different though. They are done in a private setting, ie easier to do shady shit. Trial juries are picked by both the prosecution and the defense, and it's played out in the open.